ALEXANDER THOMAS, C. S. SUDHA
Kerala Legal Services Authority – Appellant
Versus
State of Kerala – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
ALEXANDER THOMAS, J.
1. The prayers in the afore captioned W.P. (C), are as follows:
(ii) To issue a writ, order or direction directing that delay occurred I reconstructing Venthodampadi - Muthanthandu bridge due to the inaction at various levels of governance is violative of the rights of the citizen under Article 19(1)(d) and Article 21 of the Constitution of India.”
2. Heard Sri. Roshen D. Alexander, learned Advocate, instructed by Smt. Tina Alex Thomas, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, Sri. Alex M. Thombra, learned Senior Government Pleader, appearing for official respondents 1 to 5 & Additional respondent No. 9, Sri. Ebin Mathew, learned Advocate, appearing for R-7 (Kallikavu Grama Panchayat), and Sri. Deepu Lal Mohan, learned Standing Counsel, appearing for R-8 (Chokkad Grama Panchayat). Though notice
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.