IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
A. BADHARUDEEN, J.
NBCC (India) Limited – Appellant
Versus
Joshy Varghese, S/o. George – Respondent
M.S.A. Nos. 13 & 14 of 2023
Decided on : 19-09-2023
Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act, 2016 - Section 58(1) - Kerala Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Rules, 2018 - Rule 18, 36 - Second appeal - Return of amount and Compensation - Whether Kerala Real Estate Authority is bound by provisions in Rule 18 of Kerala Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Rules, 2018 with regard to rate of interest payable in case an allottee wishes to withdraw from project and take back amounts which he has paid - whether grant of interest by Authority in excess of the amount claimed is legal - Payment of interest by the allottee to promoter as provided under Section 19(7) of Kerala Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act, 2016, can be one in deviation from Rule 18 and interest can be reduced when mutually agreed to between promoter and allottee and not in any other manner. (Para 13).
Finding of the Court :
When evaluating intent behind legislation, it has to be held that, when a party if fails to claim statutory interest entitled, same shall not be a ground to hold that the party who claimed lesser interest than the statutory interest is not entitled to get statutory interest - It is held that statutory interest is liable to be granted by Authority and claim for a lesser amount as interest shall not bar allottee from getting statutory interest.
Result: Second Appeals dismissed
JUDGMENT :
These miscellaneous second appeals have been filed under Section 58(1) of the Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act, 2016.
2. M.S.A. No.13 of 2023 arises out of order in REFA No.74/2022 dated 28.02.2023 on the files of the Kerala Real Estate Appellate Tribunal, Ernakulam and the order in Complaint No.90/2022 dated 26.07.2022 on the files of the Kerala Real Estate Regulatory Authority, Thiruvananthapuram. The appellants are the appellants in REFA No.74/2022 and the respondent is the original complainant in Complaint No.90/2022.
3. M.S.A. No.14 of 2023 arises out of order in REFA No.75/2022 dated 28.02.2023 on the files of the Kerala Real Estate Appellate Tribunal, Ernakulam and the order in Complaint No.120/2022 dated 26.07.2022 on the files of the Kerala Real Estate Regulatory Authority, Thiruvananthapuram. The appellants are the appellants in REFA No.75/2022 and the respondents are the original complainants in Complaint No.120/2022.
4. Heard the learned Senior counsel for the appellants as well as the learned counsel appearing for the respondents.
5. Both these appeals admitted on 08.06.2023, raising the following question of law:
6. Precisely spelt, the dispute herein is that, when the promoter could not complete the construction as agreed, the allottees herein filed separate complaints before the Kerala Real Estate Regulatory Authority, Thiruvananthapuram seeking return of money they had given along with interest. The Regulatory Authority adjudicated the respective claims and granted the reliefs. While granting the interest, the Regulatory Authority followed Rule 18 of the Kerala Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Rules, 2018 and granted interest at the rate of 14.75% (12.75 + 2%). In the respective appeals filed against the orders by the appellants herein, the Appellate Authority also confirmed the orders. Even though the promoter deposited the principal amount, the promoter disputes entitlement of interest at the rate of 14.75% and the same is the prime question to be addressed herein.
7. The learned Senior counsel appearing for the appellants submitted that as per Rule 18 of the Kerala Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Rules, 2018 the annual interest payable by the promoter to the allottee or by the allottee to the promoter, as the case may be, is the State Bank of India's Benchmark Prime Lending Rate plus 2% interest and shall be computed as simple interest.
8. In M.S.A. No.13 of 2023, the learned senior counsel for the appellants pointed out that the interest claimed by the respondent is only 12% and the Authority granted 14.75% in excess of the claim. However, it is conceded by the learned senior counsel for the appellants further that in M.S.A. No.14 of 2023, 15% is the interest canvased where 14.75% of the interest was granted. Even though the learned Senior counsel appearing for the appellants given emphasis to Section 19 of the Act with particular reference to sub sections (5) and (6) to contend that every allottee who has entered into an agreement for sale to take an apartment, plot or building as the case may be, under Section 13, shall be responsible to make necessary payments in the manner and within the time as specified in the said agreement for sale and shall pay at the proper time and place the share of the registration charges, municipal taxes, water and electricity charges, maintenance charges, ground rent and other charges, if any, the allottee also shall be liable to pay interest as provided under sub section (7) of Section 19 of the Act, and the same shall be subject to sub section (8) of Section 19.
9. Insofar as payment of interest, the same shall be in accordance with Rule 18 of the Kerala R
When complainant confines grant of interest to a lesser amount than statutory interest, then Regulatory Authority shall confine the same to rate of interest claimed and in such cases statutory intere....
Section 37 provides that K-RERA for the purpose of discharging its functions under the provisions of Act or Rules or Regulations can issue directions from time to time to promoters allottees or real ....
The Real Estate Regulation and Development Act applies to ongoing projects and governs existing agreements. Prescribed interest rates do not override the Act's provisions.
The main legal point established is that the Real Estate Regulation & Development Act, 2016 operates retrospectively, and the levy of interest for delay is compensatory in nature, aligning with the r....
The mandatory pre-deposit requirement of the real estate legislation is a jurisdictional condition precedent. Courts cannot, through interim orders, substitute statutory interest benchmarks or dilute....
The distinction between refund of amount and compensation under the 2016 Act, and the power of the Regulatory Authority and the Adjudicating Officer to decide such matters.
The Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act, 2016 protects home buyers from delays in possession, allowing for compensation through interest, as determined by the Adjudicating Officer under the ....
The Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act does not grant promoters the right to claim compensation from allottees, and such claims must be pursued in civil court.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.