Bank Can Adjust OTS Deposit on Borrower Default, No Cheating u/s 420 IPC: Delhi High Court
02 Mar 2026
Divij Kumar Quits CMS INDUSLAW for Independent Practice
03 Mar 2026
Global Lawyers Debate AI Liability in Autonomous Vehicles
03 Mar 2026
CCPA Fines Startup ₹8 Lakh for False Child Growth Claims
05 Mar 2026
Madras High Court Scoffs at Police Custody Injury Claim
05 Mar 2026
India's Criminal Investigations Face Systemic Conviction Crisis
05 Mar 2026
Kerala HC Slams TDB Financial Discipline in Ayyappa Conclave, Orders Auditor Report on Past Anomalies: High Court of Kerala
06 Mar 2026
ST Members Can Invoke Section 13B HMA If Hinduised By Customs: Chhattisgarh High Court
06 Mar 2026
Lease Cancellation Valid Even by 'In-Charge' Mining Officer Under OMMC Rules: Orissa High Court
06 Mar 2026
Back
Next 
A. K. JAYASANKARAN NAMBIAR, KAUSER EDAPPAGATH
State Of Kerala – Appellant
Versus
Anilkumar @ Jacky, S/o. Sivathanu Pillai – Respondent
Headnote: Read headnote
ORDER :
Kauser Edappagath, J.
1. The power and jurisdiction of the High Court to order enquiry as to the mitigating circumstances of the convict in a proceeding for confirmation of death sentence under section 366 of the Code of Criminal Procedure (for short ‘Cr. P.C’) falls for consideration in these Death Sentence References (for short ‘DSRs’).
2. The respondents in the above six DSRs were convicted, inter alia, under section 302 of IPC and awarded capital punishment. The respective Sessions Court submitted the proceedings to this Court for confirmation of the death sentence. All the respondents, except respondent No.2 in DSR No.6/2018, have challenged their conviction and sentence in the separate appeals filed by them, which are also pending at this Court.
3. A Division Bench of this Court recently in State of Kerala v. Nino Mathew, (2023 KHC OnLine 369) held that the High Court can order to carry out study as to the mitigating circumstances of a dea
Sections 235(2) and 354(3) of Cr.P.C mandates sentencing court to enquire into mitigating circumstances as well as to foreclose possibility of reformation and rehabilitation before imposing death pen....
The court established that the High Court has a duty to proactively gather and consider mitigating circumstances in death penalty cases, ensuring compliance with the procedural mandates of the Cr.P.C....
The court emphasized the importance of assessing the character and behavior of the accused, obtaining psychological evaluations, and allowing access to mitigating circumstances before making a final ....
Trial courts are foreclosed from imposing such a modified or specific term sentence, or life imprisonment for the remainder of convict’s life, as an alternative to death penalty.
The court modified the death sentence to life imprisonment without remission for 30 years, emphasizing the need for proportionality in sentencing while acknowledging the heinous nature of the crime.
The court emphasized that death penalty cannot be imposed without strict adherence to procedural safeguards, and mitigating factors must be considered against aggravating circumstances when sentencin....
The court held that death sentence should be imposed only in rarest of rare cases considering the possibility of rehabilitation, thereby modifying the sentence to rigorous imprisonment for 20 years.
Capital punishment can only be imposed in 'rarest of rare' cases, and mitigating factors such as the age of the offender can influence commutation of death sentences.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
Listen Article