SATHISH NINAN
M. K. Dathan – Appellant
Versus
Thankamani @ Lakshmi Amma – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
The preliminary decree in a suit for partition is under challenge by the 11th defendant.
2. The plaintiffs and the defendants are the successors of one Bhargavi Amma who was a member of one Arackal Tarwad. The plaint schedule consists of 13 items of properties. The plaintiffs claim the properties to be family/thavazhi properties and seek for partition.
3. The 11th defendant(the appellant), who is the son of Bhargavi Amma claimed the properties to be the separate property of their mother Bhargavi Amma. He claimed exclusive title over plaint item Nos.5 and 6 on the strength of Exts.B3 and B4 Settlement Deeds, items 10 and 11 on the strength of Ext.B2 Gift Deed and item 7 under Ext.B5 Will, all executed by Bhargavi Amma. It was also contended that, plaint item No.8 is not partible since Bhargavi Amma had alienated the same to the 13th defendant under Ext.A10 Sale Deed.
4. The trial court held plaint item Nos.1 to 4 and 12 to be family properties. Plaint item Nos.5 to 11 and 13 were held to be the self acquisitions of Bhargavi Amma. The trial court held against Exts.B2 Gift
Achuthan Nair v. Chinnamu Amma AIR 1966 SC 411
Ammalu Amma and Ors v. Lakshmy Amma
Dhurandhar Prasad Singh v. Jai Prakash University
H.Venkatachala Iyengar v. B.N. Thimmajamma AIR 1959 SC 443
Janki Narayan Bhoir v. Narayan Namdeo Kadam
Kuttikrishnan Nair v Mdhavan Nair 1959 KLJ 213)
Narayani Amma v Parameswaran Pillai
Paravathi Amma Kalliani Amma v Padmanabha Pillai Krishna Pillai 1956 KLT 803
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.