JUDGMENT :

W.P (C) No. 20526 of 2023

The petitioner has approached this Court seeking a direction to the 3rd respondent to recall Ext.P3 order and pass fresh orders in his name without insisting on remitting any further conversion fee. Petitioner has sought for other consequential reliefs also.

2. Petitioner is the absolute owner and in possession of 2.02 Ares (4.99 cents) of property along with a residential building lying in resurvey no.104/2 of Nadama Thekkumbhagam Village in Ernakulam District obtained as per Ext.P1 sale deed executed on 08.07.2021. Petitioner purchased the above property from one Mr.Anoop R, who obtained the same extent of property as per sale deed No.2814 of 2012 of Tripunithura Sub Registrar Office. There is no fragmentation of property while executing Ext.P1 sale deed. Even though the entire neighbourhood is developed and nature of the land was lying as purayidam and the predecessor-in-interest of the vendor of the petitioner had obtained building permit and had constructed a building in the above-mentioned property in the year 2005, in the revenue records, the nature of the property has been shown as nilam instead of purayidam as is evident from Ext.P2 tax re