Back
VIJU ABRAHAM
M. K. Somasekhara Panicker, S/o. Krishna Kurup – Appellant
Versus
State Of Kerala – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
W.P (C) No. 20526 of 2023
The petitioner has approached this Court seeking a direction to the 3rd respondent to recall Ext.P3 order and pass fresh orders in his name without insisting on remitting any further conversion fee. Petitioner has sought for other consequential reliefs also.
2. Petitioner is the absolute owner and in possession of 2.02 Ares (4.99 cents) of property along with a residential building lying in resurvey no.104/2 of Nadama Thekkumbhagam Village in Ernakulam District obtained as per Ext.P1 sale deed executed on 08.07.2021. Petitioner purchased the above property from one Mr.Anoop R, who obtained the same extent of property as per sale deed No.2814 of 2012 of Tripunithura Sub Registrar Office. There is no fragmentation of property while executing Ext.P1 sale deed. Even though the entire neighbourhood is developed and nature of the land was lying as purayidam and the predecessor-in-interest of the vendor of the petitioner had obtained building permit and had constructed a building in the above-mentioned property in the year 2005, in the revenue records, the nature of the property has been shown as nilam instead of purayidam as is evident from Ext.P2 tax re
The central legal point established in the judgment is the transferability of rights accrued on the property and the entitlement of subsequent purchasers to the benefits accrued from the previous own....
Applications for land conversion submitted before the cut-off date are not subject to the new conditions imposed by the Amendment Act.
The imposition of conversion fees on properties under 25 cents is not warranted based on prior legal precedents.
Jurisdiction of the Revenue Divisional Officer limited by Sec.27A(11) of the Act; non-compliance does not apply as conditions were met.
Revenue Record - If orders are secured under KLU Order prior to cut off date, 30.12.2017, amended provisions of Act will not apply and additional entries regarding the change of description of land a....
The court ruled that prior permissions regarding land use are limited and require statutory application for any changes in tenure, reaffirming the need for compliance with land laws.
The inquiry under Section 27A of the Kerala Conservation of Paddy Land and Wet Land Act must focus solely on impacts to neighbouring paddy lands, disregarding irrelevant criteria for application reje....
The court confirmed the limited jurisdiction in reviewing administrative decisions under the Kerala Conservation of Paddy Land and Wet Land Act, reinforcing adherence to procedure and factual finding....
Permitting land use under Clause 6(2) does not extend to unauthorized reclamation, and remedies lie in approaching statutory authorities per Section 27A of the Paddy Act.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
