K. BABU
Elsy Francies, W/o. Vattoly Francies – Appellant
Versus
Secretary, Mattathur Grama Panchayath, Mattathur – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
This Regular Second Appeal emanates from the decree and judgment dated 15.03.2007 passed by the Munsiff’s Court, Chalakkudy, in O.S.No.266 of 2005, which was confirmed by the Principal Subordinate Judge’s Court, Irinjalakkuda in A.S. No.59 of 2007. The plaintiff is in appeal before this Court under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure.
2. The case of the plaintiff in a nutshell is as follows:-
The plaint schedule property belongs to the plaintiff. Defendant No.1 is Mattathur Grama Panchayat. The property of the Panchayat is on the eastern boundary of the plaint schedule property. The other defendants have property on the east and southern sides of the plaint schedule property. Defendant Nos.3 to 9 are making preparations to convert a thodu that lies on the east of the property as a pathway. The plaintiff attempted to protect the suit property by constructing a compound wall. The Panchayat obstructed the plaintiff. The thodu that flows on the east belongs to the plaintiff. The plaintiff is entitled to a declaration that the thodu on the east of the property belongs to her. The plaintiff is also entitled to a permanent prohibitory injunction restraining the defendants f
Sulochana Amma v. Narayanan Nair
Anathula Sudhakar v. P. Buchi Reddy (Dead) by Lrs. And Others
Gangai Vinayagar Temple and others v. Meenakashi Ammal and others
Sajjadanashin Sayed Md. B.E. Edr v. Musa Dadabhai Ummer
Vanagiri Sri Selliamman Ayyanar Uthirasomasundareswarar Temple v. Rajanga Asari
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.