IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE, SHOBA ANNAMMA EAPEN, JJ.
Bijimon K.R., S/o. Rajappan – Appellant
Versus
State Of Kerala – Respondent
WP(C) No. 28725 of 2022
Decided on : 25-01-2024
Land Assignment - Kerala Land Assignment (Regularisation of Occupation of Forest Lands Prior to 1-1-1977) Special Rules, 1993 - Section 7 of the Land Assignment Act, 1960 - Rule 2(f), Rule 5, Rule 6, Rule 7, Rule 8 of the Special Rules 1993
Fact of the Case:
The petitioner applied for assignment of forest land under the Special Rules 1993, claiming occupation prior to 1/1/1977. The Special Tahsildar found the land not included in the list of assignable lands and denied the assignment, stating it would adversely affect the Cardamom Hill Reserve.
Finding of the Court:
The court found that the petitioner failed to prove the land's inclusion in the assignable list or raise objections after its publication. It concluded that the petitioner's occupation was illegal and directed them to vacate the land.
Issues: Validity of the petitioner's claim for land assignment under the Special Rules 1993, and the legality of the occupation of the land.
Ratio Decidendi: The court held that the Special Rules 1993 provided a one-time measure for assignment of forest lands occupied prior to 1/1/1977, and the land must be included in the list of assignable lands. The court emphasized that occupants had to raise objections if their land was not included in the list, and successor-in-interest cannot claim assignment after a long lapse of time.
Final Decision: The writ petition was dismissed, and the petitioner was directed to vacate the land within one month.
JUDGMENT :
A.Muhamed Mustaque, J.
The writ petitioner, a resident of Ernakulam District applied for assignment of land invoking provisions of the Kerala Land Assignment (Regularisation of Occupation of Forest Lands Prior to 1-1-1977) Special Rules, 1993 (hereinafter referred to as the ‘Special Rules 1993’). The application was submitted for assignment of 4 acres of land in Survey No.384, 400/1 of Block No.36 in Vathikudy Village of Idukki District. According to the petitioner, his predecessor-in-interest was in occupation of the land prior to 1/1/1977. The petitioner applied for assignment of land on 8/12/2017.
2. Admittedly, the land is situated in Cardamom Hill Reserve in Udumbanchola Taluk. There is no dispute to the fact that Special Rules 1993 would apply for assignment of land situated in Cardamom Hill Reserve.
3. According to the petitioner, this land was part of Survey No.1/1 of Konnathady Village of Udumbanchola Taluk. The petitioner submitted that the predecessor-in-interest Shri Monikutty Mathew made an application for leasing the land for cardamom cultivation. It is further submitted that occupation of land by predecessor-in-interest was acknowledged by the revenue authorities as evident from Exts.P1(a), P2 and P3. The petitioner, placing reliance on Ext.P3(a), a report of the Special Deputy Tahsildar, Devikulam, to the Assistant Settlement Officer, Kumali, submitted that the entire area was converted much prior to 1977 and, therefore, there is no embargo in assigning the land under the Special Rules 1993. The petitioner’s application for assignment was considered by the Special Tahsildar. The Special Tahsildar, by Ext.P17 found that the land is not included in the list prepared under the Special Rules 1993 and absolutely no records were produced to show that this land is included in the fair land register as an assignable land. It is further observed that if such assignment is given, it will adversely affect the Cardamom Hill Reserve.
4. Now we shall advert to the Special Rules 1993. In exercise of the powers conferred on the Government of Kerala under Section 7 of the Land Assignment Act, 1960, Government of Kerala made Rules for assignment, settlement and regularization of forest lands under occupation prior to first January 1977. The validity of these rules was questioned before this Court and the Apex Court. The Apex Court negatived the challenge by upholding the legality of the rules. {See Nature Lovers Movement vs State Of Kerala & Ors [2009 (5) SCC 373]}.
5. Land is defined under Rule 2(f) of the Special Rules, 1993 as follows:
6. Rule 5 of the Special Rules 1993 states that the land sought for assignment under the Rules should have been in occupation of the assignee or predecessor-in-interest prior to 1/1/1977. Rule 6 of the Special Rules 1993 mandates preparation of a list of assignable lands. It is appropriate to reproduce Rule 6 which reads thus:
(1) The joint verification reports or the records of resurvey of the land conducted under the Kerala Survey and Boundaries Act, 1961 (Act 37 of 1961) containing the details of lands found eligible for assignment under these Rules shall be published in the concerned Village Offices and Taluk Offices inviting applications for assignment within the period specified therein.
(2) Application for assignment shall be made in Form No.2 before the Tahsildar within seven days of the publication of the list.
(3) Each application sh
Nature Lovers Movement vs State Of Kerala & Ors 2009 (5) SCC 373
The Special Rules 1993 provided a one-time measure for assignment of forest lands occupied prior to 1/1/1977, and required the land to be included in the list of assignable lands. Occupants had to ra....
A writ of mandamus requires a legal right and statutory duty, and cannot be issued contrary to law.
A writ of certiorari cannot be issued to enforce rights under repealed rules; legal rights must be based on current statutory provisions.
The main legal point established in the judgment is the requirement for transparency and eligibility in land assignment, as well as the consequences of obtaining a patta illegally and violating its c....
Possession by predecessors is relevant for patta issuance under the Kerala Land Assignment Act, and rejection of the application based on insufficient evidence of possession prior to 1/1/1977 was unj....
The main legal point established in the judgment is that authorities must establish that land is assigned with a condition prohibiting alienation before initiating proceedings under the A.P. Assigned....
The absence of a non-alienation clause in the original land assignment means it cannot be classified as assigned land under the A.P. Assigned Lands Act, allowing for its registration.
When a land is assigned specifically, the holder of the land cannot use it for any other purpose, even without a specific stipulation in the patta conditions.
Point of law : Registered sale transaction in respect of the subject land on different occasions of petitioner’s predecessors in title established that the subject land was treated as free hold land.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.