Back
ANIL K. NARENDRAN, P. G. AJITHKUMAR
Vishnunarayanan – Appellant
Versus
Secretary, Department of Revenue & Devaswom, Government Secretariat – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. eligibility criteria for melsanthies. (Para 1) |
| 2. legal framework regarding administrative control. (Para 2 , 10) |
| 3. arguments focusing on constitutional rights and regulations for temple appointments. (Para 12 , 18) |
| 4. implications of court rulings on appointments. (Para 19 , 20) |
| 5. principles established regarding religious practices. (Para 25 , 29 , 30) |
| 6. overarching conclusions on religious freedoms. (Para 31 , 32) |
| 7. court's emphasis on constitutional principles against caste-based appointment practices. (Para 33 , 34) |
JUDGMENT :
Anil K. Narendran, J.
| INDEX | ||
| Sl. No. | Description | Pages |
| 1. | Background and pleadings | 12-31 |
| 2. | Provisions under the TRAVANCORE-COCHIN HINDU RELIGIOUS INSTITUTIONS ACT , 1950 | 32-38 |
| 3. | Whether State of Kerala through Revenue (Devaswom) Department have administrative control over Sabarimala Devaswom and Malikappuram Devaswom and whether Travancore Devaswom Board is fully controlled by the State | 39-42 |
| 4. | The guidelines and terms of settlement in the matter of appointment of Melsanthies in Sabarimala Devaswom and Malikappuram Devaswom. | 42-67 |
| 5. | Applicability of the provisions under the Ke | |
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
