Back
KAUSER EDAPPAGATH
Joshy Francis, S/o Francis – Appellant
Versus
James George, S/o Georeg – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
This original petition has been filed challenging Ext.P11 order passed by the Additional District Court-IV, Thodupuzha (for short, the Commercial Appellate Court) dismissing an application to stay the operation of the interim injunction order passed by the Commercial Court, Kattappana, under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (for short, the Arbitration Act).
2. The petitioners and respondents are partners of the registered partnership firm named D' Heavenly Mist, constituted by a deed of partnership dated 12/8/2016 and reconstituted later on 24/6/2022. Admittedly, the 1st respondent was the managing partner of the firm. The majority of the partners took a decision to remove the 1st respondent from the position of managing partner in the meeting of the partners held on 12/6/2023 and he was removed. It is alleged that the 1st respondent was so removed since his conduct was in violation of the terms of the partnership and detrimental to the interest of the partnership business. On removal of the 1st respondent from the post of managing partner of the firm, the 7th respondent assumed charge as managing partner on 13/6/2023. Respondents 1 to 4 challenged t
The main legal point established in the judgment is the requirement of manifest intention to arbitrate under Section 9 of the Arbitration Act, and the legal effectiveness of an interim order under Se....
Jurisdiction for extending arbitration periods falls to District Courts under Section 29A(4) of the Arbitration Act, distinct from High Court powers under Section 11(6).
The main legal point established in the judgment is the exclusive jurisdiction of the High Court to appoint an arbitral tribunal under section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, and th....
Sub-section (3) of Section 9 provides for restriction of exercise of powers by the Court and it has to decide whether the remedy provided under section 17 is efficacious or not.
The court clarified that the initiation of arbitral proceedings is marked by the notice of appointment of an arbitrator, and the court retains the discretion to extend interim measures beyond the sta....
The High Court has the authority to extend the mandate of the Arbitrator if the arbitration proceeding could not be concluded within a reasonable time, as per Section 29A of the Arbitration and Conci....
Point of law: When a suit or proceeding is not thrown out in limine but the Court receives it for consideration and disposal according to law, it must be regarded as entertaining the suit or proceedi....
The court reaffirmed that the scope of inquiry under Section 11 is limited to determining the prima facie existence of an arbitration agreement, and the withdrawal of a prior application does not con....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
