US Constitution Trumps Presidential Tariff Powers
28 Feb 2026
Non-Compliance with Court Summons Amounts to Contempt: Allahabad HC Issues Warrant Against HDFC Life Branch Head in Cheating Bail Case
02 Mar 2026
Bank Can Adjust OTS Deposit on Borrower Default, No Cheating u/s 420 IPC: Delhi High Court
02 Mar 2026
Divij Kumar Quits CMS INDUSLAW for Independent Practice
03 Mar 2026
Global Lawyers Debate AI Liability in Autonomous Vehicles
03 Mar 2026
CCPA Fines Startup ₹8 Lakh for False Child Growth Claims
05 Mar 2026
Madras High Court Scoffs at Police Custody Injury Claim
05 Mar 2026
India's Criminal Investigations Face Systemic Conviction Crisis
05 Mar 2026
Kerala HC Slams TDB Financial Discipline in Ayyappa Conclave, Orders Auditor Report on Past Anomalies: High Court of Kerala
06 Mar 2026
Back
Next 
A. MUHAMED MUSTAQUE, P. M. MANOJ
Kerala Public Service Commission, Represented By Its Secretary, Kerala Public Service Commission – Appellant
Versus
Sabeena K. S. , D/o. Saludeen K. P. – Respondent
Headnote: Read headnote
JUDGMENT :
(A. Muhamed Mustaque, J.) :
This case revolves around a challenge to a seemingly neutral rule of the Public Service Commission (PSC) regarding the submission of qualification certificates by the stipulated deadline, due to its disproportionate impact on individuals like Sabeena K.S., a 35-year-old differently-abled woman with 100% visual disability, the first respondent herein. Sabeena applied for the post of Upper Primary School (UP) Teacher in response to a notification issued by the PSC on 31/12/2019. The last date for receipt of completed applications was 05/02/2020. Unfortunately, she failed to upload her Kerala Teacher Eligibility Test (KTET) certificate, a mandatory qualification, with her application. Consequently, her application was rejected on 27/08/2021. PSC published a short list of candidates on 02/09/2021. Sabeena brought her grievance to the Tribunal, arguing that the rigid application of the rule unfairly discriminated against her due to her visual disability. Tribunal found that Sabeena had acquired the necessary qualifications, including the KTET certificate, well before the issuance of t
The judgment establishes that reasonable accommodation is essential for achieving substantive equality for individuals with disabilities in public employment processes.
The court emphasized that rigid adherence to recruitment rules without considering reasonable accommodation for individuals with disabilities violates their rights under the RPwD Act.
The principle of reasonable accommodation under the Rights of Persons with Disabilities Act mandates that all individuals with disabilities are entitled to employment opportunities without rigid adhe....
Reasonable accommodation is a fundamental right ensuring equality for persons with disabilities; technicalities should not obstruct justice for discrimination cases.
(1) Rights of persons with disabilities to equal opportunity – Enforcement of – Equality, in its truest sense, demands not uniformity but removal of barriers that prevent individuals from standing on....
The judgment emphasizes the statutory provisions and government orders governing age relaxation, grace marks, and reservation for PwDs, and directs the respondents to work out backlog vacancies and p....
The court ruled that candidates with disabilities must not be discriminated against based on their degree of disability, ensuring equal treatment in public employment.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
Listen Article