Thomas – Appellant
Versus
State of Kerala – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
G.Girish, J.
The judgment dated 27.09.2017 of the Additional Sessions Court-I, Kottayam in S.C.No.116/2012 convicting and sentencing the sole accused for the commission of offence under Sections 449 and 302 I.P.C, is under challenge in this appeal. The appellant herein who faced trial in the said case, was awarded life imprisonment and fine Rs.50,000/- under Section 302 I.P.C and rigorous imprisonment for five years and a fine of Rs.10,000/- under Section 449 I.P.C.
Prosecution Case
2. The accused and the victim are neighbours. A pathway in front of the courtyard of the house of the victim, is the only way of access to the residence of the accused. The transit of the accused and the persons associated with him through the above pathway often gave rise to issues between the victim and the accused. The accused wanted to widen the above pathway into a cartable road, but the victim was not willing to surrender land for it. Due to the above grudge, the accused used to verbally abuse the victim and his wife and threaten them. On 23.02.2011 at about 2:15 p.m, the accused, as usual, parked his Maruti Omni Van at the road ending near the residence of the victim and walked through the
The accused, as the initial aggressor, cannot claim self-defense against actions taken in response to his provocation, leading to the upheld conviction for murder.
The right of private defense is not available to an aggressor, and the evidence supported the conviction for murder and criminal trespass.
The court determined that the accused's actions constituted culpable homicide not amounting to murder due to the absence of premeditation and the nature of the altercation, altering the conviction fr....
Special circumstances exist mitigating the gravity of the offence, which appeals to our judicial conscience and discretion to show clemency to the accused in the matter of sentence.
The central legal point established in the judgment is the distinction between culpable homicide and murder under the Indian Penal Code, and the assessment of the accused's knowledge and intention in....
If intention of accused was limited to infliction of a bodily injury sufficient to cause death in ordinary course of nature and did not extend to intention of causing death, offence would be murder.
(1) Right of private defence (Self-defence) – Self-preservation is basic human instinct and is duly recognised by criminal jurisprudence of all civilized countries – In order to justify act of causin....
The accused's actions exceeded the limits of self-defence, constituting murder rather than culpable homicide, as he pursued and stabbed the deceased after the initial threat had ceased.
The distinction between murder and culpable homicide hinges on intention and circumstances, with the court applying Exception-4 of Section 300 IPC in cases of sudden quarrel.
The court distinguished between murder and culpable homicide, ruling that the appellant's act was committed in the heat of passion without premeditation, thus constituting culpable homicide not amoun....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.