ORDER :

2. Heard the learned counsel for the revision petitioners and the learned Public Prosecutor appearing for the respondent.

4. The prosecution case is that, in furtherance of common intention shared by the accused to outrage the modesty of the de facto complainant, at about 8.00 p.m. on 18.9.2011 while the de facto complainant was travelling in an Autorickshaw along with accused Nos.1 and 2 through Nellikala-Vattakavu public road, the 1st accused pressed on the left breast of the de facto complainant and the 2nd accused caught on her belly and thereby, outraged her modesty. Thus, offence under Section 354 r/w Section 34 of the IPC was alleged by the prosecution against the accused. Initially, crime was registered alleging commission of the said offence and on completion of investigation final report also filed accordingly.

6. The trial court addressed the question as to whether the prosecution succeeded in proving commission of offence under Section 354 r/w Section 34 of th