IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
P.V. KUNHIKRISHNAN, J.
Manimeghala W/o Vallarasu - Appellant
Versus
State of Kerala - Respondent
Bail APPL. No. 2928 of 2025
Decided On : 06-03-2025
(A) Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 - Sections 62 r/w 304(2) and 303(2) - Bail application filed by petitioners accused of theft of gold chains - Petitioners in custody since 28.01.2025, with maximum punishment under 7 years - Court emphasizes that bail is the rule, jail is the exception. (Paras 1 , 5 , 8 )
(B) Judicial principles on bail - The Supreme Court has reiterated that bail should not be denied as punishment and must be granted when a case is made out. (Paras 5 , 6 , 7 )
Facts of the case:
Petitioners are accused in two separate crimes involving theft, arrested on 28.01.2025, with allegations based on confession.
Findings of Court:
Bail application allowed with conditions including execution of bonds and local sureties.
Issues: The main issues were the nature of the allegations, the petitioners' criminal antecedents, and the principles governing bail.
Ratio Decidendi: The court ruled that the principle of bail being the rule and jail the exception must be upheld, emphasizing the need for fair trial opportunities.
Result: Bail application allowed.
ORDER :
P.V. KUNHIKRISHNAN, J.
These Bail Application are filed under Section 483 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita . These bail applications are connected and filed by the same petitioners. The petitioners are accused in Crime No. 86/2025 and in Crime No. 1000/2024 of Medical College Police Station, Kozhikode. Crime No 86/2025 of Medical College Police Station, Kozhikode is registered against the petitioners alleging offences punishable under Secs.62 r/w 304 (2) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 (for short 'BNS'). Crime No. 1000/2024 of Medical College Police Station is registered against the petitioners alleging offences punishable under Secs. 303 (2) of the BNS.
2. The allegation against the petitioners in both these cases is that the petitioners committed theft of gold chains. The petitioner was arrested in crime No.86/2025 on 28.01.2025. Crime No.1000/2024 was registered by the Medical College Police Station, in which the accused is not identified. When the petitioners were questioned, based on the confession, they were implicated as accused in Crime No. 1000/2024 of Medical College Police Station.
3. Heard counsel for the petitioners and the Public Prosecutor.
4. This Court considered the contentions of the petitioners and the Public Prosecutor. The petitioners are in custody from 28.01.2025. The maximum punishment that can be imposed for the offences alleged are below 7 years. The Public Prosecutor submitted that there are criminal antecedents to the petitioners. Even then, the petitioners cannot be indefinitely incarcerated. The Public Prosecutor also submitted that the petitioners are the natives of Tamil Nadu. At this stage, the counsel for the petitioners submitted that the petitioners will furnish local sureties and the same is recorded. I make it clear that this is not an order from the court. This is a voluntary submission from the counsel for the petitioners. If that is the case, the petitioners can be released on bail, after imposing stringent conditions.
5. Moreover, it is a well accepted principle that the bail is the rule and the jail is the exception. The Hon'ble Supreme Court in Chidambaram. P v Directorate of Enforcement [2019 (16) SCALE 870] , after considering all the earlier judgments, observed that, the basic jurisprudence relating to bail remains the same inasmuch as the grant of bail is the rule and refusal is the exception so as to ensure that the accused has the opportunity of securing fair trial.
6. Moreover, in Jalaluddin Khan v. Union of India [2024 KHC 6431] , the Hon'ble Supreme Court observed that:
“21. Before we part with the Judgment, we must mention here that the Special Court and the High Court did not consider the material in the charge sheet objectively. Perhaps the focus was more on the activities of PFI, and therefore, the appellant's case could not be properly appreciated. When a case is made out for a grant of bail, the Courts should not have any hesitation in granting bail. The allegations of the prosecution may be very serious. But, the duty of the Courts is to consider the case for grant of bail in accordance with the law. "Bail is the rule and jail is an exception" is a settled law. Even in a case like the present case where there are stringent conditions for the grant of bail in the relevant statutes, the same rule holds good with only modification that the bail can be granted if the conditions in the statute are satisfied. The rule also means that once a case is made out for the grant of bail, the Court cannot decline to grant bail. If the Courts start denying bail in deserving cases, it will be a violation of the rights guaranteed under Art.21 of our Constitution.”
(underline supplied)
7. In Manish Sisodia v. Directorate of Enforcement [2024 KHC 6426] , also the Hon'ble Supreme Court observed that:
“53. The Court further observed that, over a period of time, the trial courts and the High Courts have forgotten a very well - settled principle of law that bail i
Bail is the rule and jail is the exception; courts must grant bail when a case is made out, ensuring fair trial rights.
Bail is the rule and jail is the exception; courts must grant bail unless compelling reasons exist to deny it.
Bail is the rule and jail is the exception; courts must grant bail unless compelling reasons exist to deny it.
Bail is the rule and jail is the exception; courts must grant bail when conditions are satisfied to ensure fair trial rights.
Bail is the rule and jail is the exception; police must justify the necessity of arrest under Section 41 CrPC.
Bail is the rule and jail is the exception; courts must grant bail unless compelling reasons exist to deny it.
Bail is the rule and jail is the exception; courts must grant bail unless compelling reasons exist to deny it.
Bail is the rule and jail is the exception; courts must grant bail when conditions are met, ensuring fair trial rights.
Bail is the rule and jail is the exception; courts must grant bail unless compelling reasons exist to deny it.
Bail is the rule and jail is the exception; courts must grant bail unless compelling reasons exist.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.