IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
DEVAN RAMACHANDRAN, J
The Mannam Sugar Mills Co-operative Ltd. - Appellant
Versus
Deputy Superintendent Of Police, - Respondent
WP(C) NO. 1671 OF 2021
Decided On : 20-02-2025
(A) Kerala Co-operative Societies Act - Public interest litigation concerning unauthorized installation of permanent flag masts in public spaces - The petitioner sought protection to remove illegal flag masts erected by political parties without permission - The Government acknowledged the issue and proposed regulations to prevent future installations. (Paras 1-19)
(B) Public Interest - The court emphasized that illegal installations must be addressed irrespective of the entities involved, reinforcing the principle that no one is above the law. (Paras 4, 16)
(C) Government Responsibility - The court directed the Government to formulate a policy for the removal of existing illegal flag masts and to ensure compliance with applicable laws. (Paras 18-20)
Facts of the case:
The petitioner, a registered society, highlighted the widespread issue of unauthorized flag masts erected by political parties in public areas, prompting the court's intervention.
Findings of Court:
The court confirmed that no new flag masts will be allowed without proper permissions and mandated the Government to act against existing illegal installations.
Issues: The main issues included the legality of existing flag masts and the Government's responsibility to regulate their installation.
Ratio Decidendi: The court ruled that illegal installations must be removed and that the Government must ensure compliance with the law, emphasizing that all entities are subject to legal scrutiny.
Result: The Writ Petition was ordered, confirming that no new flag masts will be erected without permission.
JUDGMENT :
Though impelled as a private concern, the petitioner - which is a Society registered under the Kerala Co- operative Societies Act - in fact, projects a very compelling public cause, namely, that persons and entities are installing permanent Flag Masts in public places around the State, without obtaining even a semblance of permission from any Authority.
2. The petitioner approached this Court seeking directions to the Police Officers concerned to afford them adequate and effective protection, so as to remove illegal flag masts allegedly erected by certain political parties - namely respondents 4, 5 and 6, on the public road leading to their property.
3. This Court took cognizance of the matter as being one in public cause also, because it was conceded even by the official respondents that such illegal flag masts/posts are ubiquitous in our State.
4. Certain interim orders were then issued - with which I will deal presently - and, consequent to it, it is now reported by Sri.R.T Pradeep, learned counsel for the petitioner, that all offending Flag Posts/Masts have been removed pending this lis. He, however, raised a concern that unless this Court issues stringent general orders, respondents 4 to 6 or other may place such Posts/Masts again.
5. I felt justification in this apprehension and it is thus that this matter is still pending.
6. Interestingly, the Government, through its learned Additional Advocate General, Shri.Ashok M. Cherian, instructed by Shri. T.S.Shyam Prasanth - learned Government Pleader, informed this Court, as early as on 20.12.2021, that the Government is taking the issue very seriously; and that they intend to ensure that no unauthorised and illegal Flag Masts are put up in future. This was recorded in the order of the said day, as follows:
The learned Additional Advocate General, Sri.Asok M.Cherian, submitted that the Government has taken the observation of this Court very seriously and that they propose to bring out Regulations with respect to the unauthorised flagmasts. He added that some of the District Collectors have already taken action in terms of the directions in the afore order and that the other District Collectors will do so and report before this Court; for which purpose, he requested another month's time.
I do not need to reiterate the resolve of this Court, since it has already been unambiguously stated in the earlier orders.
What is illegal must be deemed to be illegal, whoever has done it. No one is above law and, as they say: however, high you are, the law is always above you.
Imperative actions certainly will have to be taken in terms of law and under the constitutional mandate, without looking at the entities or persons who are the perpetrators.
I, therefore, adjourn this matter to be called on 27.01.2022.
Since I have heard this matter fully and since interim orders have also been issued, leading to the issuance of a final judgment, I deem it appropriate that this matter be treated as being “part-heard”.
Needless to say, the District Collectors will act as per the afore referred order in its true spirit; and reports will be filed by the next posting date.
7. Subsequently, on 27.01.2022, Shri.S.Kannan, learned Government Pleader, reaffirmed that the Government will not permit any new permanent Flag Masts to be erected anywhere illegally; and this was also recorded in the order issued on that day, with certain directions issued on its basis, ut infra:
Sri.S.Kannan – learned Senior Government Pleader, requested for time on behalf of the learned Additional Advocate General – Sr.Asok M.Cherian, saying that he is presently indisposed.
Sri.S.Kannan, however, submitted that, imbibing the spirit of the orders passed by this Court already, no new flag masts are being allowed to be erected, and that action has also been taken in various districts to remove those which have been illegally done. In fact, Sri.R.T.Pradeep – learned counsel for the petitioner, affirms that the illegal flag masts involved in t
The court affirmed that unauthorized flag masts in public spaces must be removed and that no new installations are permitted without proper legal authorization.
No legal provision allows the permanent erection of political party flagpoles in public places; unauthorized flagpoles must be removed.
The Court mandates local authorities to remove unauthorized installations to combat visual pollution and emphasizes personal accountability for non-compliance.
The Municipal Corporation must act promptly against unauthorized displays of flags, as stipulated by the Maharashtra Prevention of Defacement of Property Act, 1995.
Statutory provisions governing unauthorized constructions must be adhered to by municipal authorities when issuing orders or taking action against such constructions.
where on the admitted or indisputable facts only one conclusion is possible and under the law only one penalty is permissible, the court may not issue its writ to compel the observance of natural jus....
The court established that unauthorized constructions in eco-sensitive areas cannot be regularized post facto, and the right to seek regularization is not available to those who violate planning laws....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.