SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Mad) 4045

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN, J.
R.Kathiravan - Appellant 
Versus 
The Divisional Engineer, Highways Department - Respondent 
W.P(MD)Nos.29035, 29217 & 30354 of 2024 and W.M.P(MD)Nos.29035 & 24599 of 2024 & 286 of 2025
Decided on : 27-01-2025

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant : Mr.P.Balamurugan
For the Respondent:Mr.R.Baskaran Additional Advocate General Assisted by  Mr.S.Shanmugavel Additional Government Pleader, Mr.Hasan Mohammed Jinnah State Public Prosecutor Assisted by Mr.R.M.Anbunithi Additional Public Prosecutor

No legal provision allows the permanent erection of political party flagpoles in public places; unauthorized flagpoles must be removed.

Headnote:(A) Tamil Nadu Highways Act, 2001 - Section 26 - Control of National Highways (Land and Traffic) Act, 2002 - Sections 24 and 25 - Erection of political party flagpoles - No law permits the erection of permanent flagpoles in public places; unauthorized flagpoles must be removed. (Paras 43, 44)

(B) Public Property - Encroachment - Erection of flagpoles obstructs public use and poses safety risks; authorities must ensure compliance with statutory provisions. (Paras 38, 39)

Facts of the case:
The petitioner challenged the rejection of requests to erect party flagpoles in public places, citing safety concerns and lack of legal provisions for such permissions.

Findings of Court:
The court found that no law allows for the permanent erection of flagpoles in public areas, leading to safety hazards and legal issues.

Issues: The main issues included the legality of erecting flagpoles in public spaces and the authority of local bodies to grant such permissions.

Ratio Decidendi: The court ruled that the erection of flagpoles without legal permission constitutes encroachment on public property, which is prohibited by law.

Result: Writ petitions dismissed.

ORDER :

G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN, J.

W.P(MD)No.29035 of 2024 has been filed by the petitioner challenging the order passed by the second respondent dated 29.11.2024 thereby rejecting the request made by the petitioner to erect their party flagpole at Ward No.74, Bus-Stop, Opposite to Jeyam Theatre, Bye-pass Road, Palanganatham, Madurai.

2. W.P(MD)No.29217 of 2024 has been filed by the petitioner for a direction directing the respondents to grant permission to erect their party flagpole at opposite to MGR Mandram at Kamatchi Nagar, Vilankudi, Ward No.20, Madurai City.

3. W.P(MD)No.30354 of 2024 has been filed by the petitioner for a direction directing the respondents to grant permission for reinstalling their party flagpole at Athipatti Village, Peraiyur Taluk, Madurai District.

4. In all the Writ Petitions, the issue is common and as such, this Court dispose of all the Writ Petitions by common order.

5. The petitioner in W.P(MD)No.29035 of 2024 submitted a representation before the respondents seeking permission to erect their party flagpole at Ward No.74, Bus-Stop, Opposite to Jeyam Theatre, Bye-pass Road, Palanganatham, Madurai and the same was rejected by the second respondent dated 29.11.2024, on the ground that there would be possible for accident.

6. W.P(MD)Nos.29217 and 30354 of 2024 have been filed by the petitioner for a direction directing the respondents to grant permission to erect their party flagpole in their respective mentioned places.

7. This Court raised the following questions to the respondents:

(i) Whether any law provides granting permission to erect the political parties or Communities or Religions or Organizations flagpole permanently in the land owned by the National Highways, State Highways, Corporations, Municipalities and Local Bodies.

(ii) What basis on which the Police authorities and the Revenue authorities are granting No Objection Certificate for erecting the political parties, Communities, Religions and organizations' flagpoles permanently in the public land owned by various authorities.

(iii) How many cases have been registered with regard to disputes between the political parties while erecting their respective flagpole, while celebrating public functions near their respective party flagpole and hindrance to public and transport or any untoward incident which had happened due to the erection of respective parties flagpole.

8. The Director General of Police/Head of Police Force, Tamil Nadu filed a status report stating that so far 114 cases were registered in connection with the issue raised by this Court arising out of the erection of flagpoles of political parties. Out of 114 cases, 77 cases were registered for erecting flagpoles without getting necessary permission from the authorities and 37 cases were registered against grave incidents involving prevention of discharge of duty by Government servants, damage to public property, road roko/agitations, stone pelting hurt/grievous hurt/attempt to murder and Prevention of Atrocities Act. Further revealed from the status report that already the Hon'ble Division Bench of this Court issued directions in W.P.No.17768 of 2016, dated 02.04.2019 [A.Radhakrishnan Vs. Chief Electoral Officer, Secretary to Government and others] to remove and regulate the erection of flagpoles of political parties in public places and roads. The directions issued by the Hon'ble Division Bench of this Court in W.P.No.17768 of 2016, dated 02.04.2019 are as follows:

19. Erection of poles without permission is an encroachment, as per provisions of the statutes extracted supra. Such encroachments noticed already have been moved. Therefore, it is for the authorities under the above- said statutes to ensure that there is no fresh encroachment after the declarations of elections. There shall not be any flagpoles with or without construction, on any streets, roads, state or national highways, as the case may be, without permission of the authorities under the above-said Acts.

20. Judicial notice be

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top