Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
MR. JUSTICE M.A.ABDUL HAKHIM, J
E.T. Mohanan S/o. Late Theethan – Appellant
Versus
Pankajakshy W/o. Late Theethan – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
M.A.ABDUL HAKHIM, J.
1. These appeals arise from O.S No.345/2004 of the Principal Sub Court Palakkad, which was filed for partition of A & B schedule properties. The plaintiff is the appellant in both the appeals. Even though partition is sought with respect to plaint A and B Schedule properties, B schedule property was later deleted with leave to institute a fresh suit for the same. The properties included in Plaint A Schedule are the properties included in the C schedule of Ext.A11 Partition Deed dt. 10.02.1973.
2. Admitted facts are that the parties belonged to Hindu Ezhava community. Raman, grandfather of the plaintiff, had three sons- Rakkandi, Kittu, and Theethan (1st defendant). His wife was Nagunni. Raman died around 1952. The plaintiff is the son of 1st defendant. The plaintiff and his sisters, who are the defendants 6 to 8, are the children of the 1st defendant in his first marriage with Janaki. On the death of Janaki, the 1st defendant married the 2nd defendant, and the defendants 3 to 5 are the sons born in that wedlock. The aforesaid children and wife of Raman executed Ext.A11 Partition Deed in the year 1973, partitioning the properties among them in which C sc
The presumption of joint family property applies unless proven otherwise, and the burden of proof lies on the party asserting separation.
The burden of proof lies on the party asserting that property is joint family property, and mere existence of a joint family does not presume property to be joint.
The burden of proof lies on asserting self-acquisition when joint family property is claimed, as evidenced in the judgment affirming the trial court's findings on property character.
In joint family property disputes, a claimant asserting self-acquisition must provide substantial proof, while joint ancestral claims are upheld unless clearly disproven.
The main legal point established in the judgment is that properties acquired from individual earnings of family members cannot be treated as joint family properties unless deliberate abandonment and ....
The courts erred in determining property status, failing to recognize that once a joint family is established, the burden shifts to defendants to prove self-acquisition.
A party claiming self-acquisition of property within a joint family must provide substantial evidence; failure to do so, combined with existing partition evidence, undermines their claims.
Widow's right to claim share in ancestral property established under Hindu Succession Act, where properties purchased through ancestral nucleus retain joint family character.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
