Karnataka HC Notices Sri Lankan Judge's Rights Plea
07 Mar 2026
Karnataka Proposes Social Media Ban for Under-16s
07 Mar 2026
Justice Dharmadhikari Sworn In as 55th Madras HC Chief Justice
07 Mar 2026
Punjab HC Acquits Ram Rahim in Journalist Murder
07 Mar 2026
Appellate Courts Can Rely on Unexhibited Public Documents Produced by Plaintiff: Gujarat High Court Dismisses Second Appeal Under Section 100 CPC
07 Mar 2026
Punjab & Haryana HC Denies Anticipatory Bail in Murder via Humiliation Case: Sections 103(1) & 3(5) BNS
07 Mar 2026
Security Deposit Forfeiture Without Show-Cause Notice Violates Natural Justice: Himachal Pradesh High Court
07 Mar 2026
S.202 CrPC Inquiry Not Mandatory for Public Servant Complaints If Accused Outside Jurisdiction: Supreme Court
09 Mar 2026
Professor MP Singh: Shaper of Constitutional Discourse
09 Mar 2026
Back
Next 
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
EASWARAN S.
Haridasan S/o. Thekeveluthedath Bhavaniamma – Appellant
Versus
Padmavathi Amma W/o. Thekeveluthedath Achuthan Nair – Respondent
Headnote: Read headnote
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. background of partition suit and property claims. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5) |
| 2. arguments presented by both parties regarding property ownership. (Para 6 , 7 , 8) |
| 3. court's analysis on joint family property and evidence. (Para 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20) |
| 4. discussion on marumakkathayam law and property acquisition. (Para 21 , 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 , 26 , 27 , 28 , 29 , 30 , 31 , 32< |
The courts erred in determining property status, failing to recognize that once a joint family is established, the burden shifts to defendants to prove self-acquisition.
The presumption of joint family property applies unless proven otherwise, and the burden of proof lies on the party asserting separation.
The plaintiff must prove the existence of a joint family nucleus to establish claims over joint family properties; mere relation does not imply entitlement.
Under Marumakkathayam law, property obtained by a female and her children in partition retains its tharwad characteristics, ensuring rights for future descendants.
The burden of proof in establishing the nature of property under Hindu law rests on the party asserting its joint family character. The concept of a nucleus from which properties are acquired and the....
The burden of proof lies on asserting self-acquisition when joint family property is claimed, as evidenced in the judgment affirming the trial court's findings on property character.
The court affirmed that partition of family properties had occurred prior to 1942, establishing individual ownership rights over properties acquired post-partition, thereby negating claims of joint f....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
Listen Article