IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
AMIT RAWAL, K.V. JAYAKUMAR, JJ.
Dr. Neha Mariam George, D/o. George Thomas and Ors. – Petitioners
Versus
The National Medical Commission, Represented By Its Director and Ors. – Respondents
WA Nos.2158/2024, 81/2025, 98/2025, 1135/2025, 1304/2025, 1361/2025, 1375/2025, 176/2025, 2649/2025, 2738/2025, 2926/2025, 2159/2024, 2164/2024, 2166/2024, 2167/2024, 46688/2024, 46727/2024, 2176/2024, 2178/2024, 46798/2024
Decided On : 10-04-2025
(A) Post Graduate Medical Education Regulations, 2023 - Circular dated 22.5.2024 - Requirement of 80% attendance in final year for examination - The court found the circular inconsistent with the National Medical Commission's regulations, which require 80% attendance over the entire course period. The University,s insistence on attendance in each academic year was deemed onerous and contrary to the regulations. (Paras 1 , 18 , 19 )
(B) University Powers - The court affirmed the University,s authority to set attendance requirements but ruled that these must align with national regulations. (Paras 8 , 19 )
Facts of the case:
The appellants, post-graduate medical students, challenged a circular mandating 80% attendance in the final year, arguing it contradicted national regulations allowing for 80% attendance over the entire course.
Findings of Court:
The court held that the circular was invalid as it conflicted with the National Medical Commission's regulations, which govern attendance requirements for examinations.
Issues: The main issues included whether the University could impose stricter attendance requirements than those set by the National Medical Commission and the validity of the circular mandating attendance in the final year.
Ratio Decidendi: The court concluded that the University,s circular was inconsistent with the National Medical Commission's regulations, which require a cumulative attendance of 80% over the entire course, not just in the final year.
Result: The writ appeals were allowed, and the circular dated 22.5.2024 was quashed.
JUDGMENT :
Amit Rawal, J.
This order shall dispose of twenty (20) writ appeals preferred against the common judgment dated 18.12.2024 disposing of various writ petitions whereby the appellants- petitioners were not successful in assailing the circular dated 22.5.2024 of the University called Kerala University of Health Science (KUHS) imposing a condition of having minimum 80% attendance in the total course period with at least 80% attendance in the Final year to satisfy the requirement of attendance to appear for the University examinations, in defiance to the regulations of 2023, promulgated Post Graduate Medical Education Regulations, 2023 (PGMER, 2023) vide notification dated 29.12.2023 by the National Medical Commission for adjudication of the controversy.
2. Succinctly, the facts in brief are enumerated herein below:
All the appellants-petitioners are Doctors, who have obtained admission for Post Graduate Courses in various Medical Colleges in the State affiliated with the University for the academic year 2021-2022. On the basis of the allotment by the Centralized authority appointed by the State and Central Government. The details of the courses being pursued by the different petitioners have been given in paragraph 1 of the writ petition which is not relevant for the adjudication of the lis. From the academic year 2021-2022, the competent authority had decided to conduct four rounds of all India quota counseling for NEET – Undergraduate and Post Graduate as per the modified Scheme. The said scheme came into consideration before the Supreme Court in SLP (C) No.10487 of 2021 and during the pendency of the matter, the Hon'ble court was informed that the modified scheme shall be implemented for the year 2021-2022 for admissions to NEET- Undergraduate and Post Graduate.
3. The National Medical Commission caused a notification dated 11.1.2022 intimating that academic session for the broad specialty courses for the year 2021 shall commence from 1.2.2022.
4. The National Medical Commission promulgated a notification dated 29.12.2023 called Post Graduate Medical Education Regulations (PGMER, 2023) and as per clause 5.5 of the regulation dealing with leave rules for Post Graduate Students prescribing that a candidate shall be able to appear in the examination if one has 80% of the attendance. The aforementioned clarification came in pursuance of the clause 5.5 mentioning that if the candidates avails the leave in excess of permitted number of days, his or her term of course shall be extended by same number of days to complete the 'training period'. Thus what is deduced is the 'examination' and training period' are two different stages. The aforementioned notification was clarified by the respondent vide public notice dated 10.4.2024 and in response to query No.2, it was clarified that total days in a three year course will be 1095 days and the total working days will be 939 days after deducting weekly off ie., 156 days. The student thus would require 80% of attendance of working days ie., 751 days of 939 days for appearing in the 'examination'. However, the training period will be extended by the same number of days for which the maternity / paternity leave or total excess casual leave has been availed in three (3) years.
5. The Kerala University of Health Sciences vide Circular dated 25.7.2024 on the subject of KUHS-Exam-Medical (A)- Medical PG Degree/Diploma R&S Examinations (Regular applicable for 2021 Admission) – Commencement of Examination – reg. clarified that the tentative examination calendar for the Academic Year 2024-25, the Medical PG Degree/Diploma Regular & Supplementary Examination for 2021 Admission was scheduled on 10th March, 2025. It was issued on the basis of the direction of the National Medical Commission (NMC). On 22.5.2024, KUHS vide impugned circular introduced a different condition ie., alien to the condition promulgated by the National Medical Commission as per the regulations 2023 as well as the notice of 10.
The court ruled that attendance requirements for medical examinations must comply with national regulations, rejecting stricter university mandates.
A university can impose higher attendance requirements than those set by the National Medical Commission, ensuring educational quality without legal infringement.
University attendance requirements must align with Bar Council regulations, ensuring students are not unjustly denied educational progression.
The court upheld the minimum percentile requirement for postgraduate medical admissions, asserting the importance of maintaining high educational standards in medical education, which cannot be compr....
Strict attendance requirements upheld; condonation requires Syndicate approval under university statutes, not court intervention without proper pleadings.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.