Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
C. JAYACHANDRAN, J
Paul Joseph S/o.joseph – Appellant
Versus
Thresiakutty, @ Theresa – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
W.P. (C) No. 37816 of 2017
1. The petitioner is the previous husband of the 1st respondent and the respondent in M.C No.39/2011 of the Chief Judicial Magistrate Court, Thodupuzha, filed under Section 12 of the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005.
2. Petitioner challenges Ext.P3(a) and P3(b) demand notice issued in terms of the provisions of the Kerala Revenue Recovery Act.
3. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Public Prosecutor.
4. Though notice was served on the 1st respondent/wife, there is no appearance before this Court.
5. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that, Ext.P1 Order was passed by the Chief Judicial Magistrate Court, Thodupuzha, granting relief under Section 22 of the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005, as per which Rs.2,00,000/- has been awarded to compensate the mental harassment and cruelty to the respondent/wife by the petitioner/husband. Besides, a sum of Rs.5,00,000/- was also granted as compensation. The learned counsel would pinpoint that, no amount, whatsoever, was granted towards maintenance in Ext.P1 Order. In purported enforcement of the Ext.P1 Order, Ext.P2 petition, bearing Crl.M.P No
The Kerala Revenue Recovery Act cannot be used to enforce monetary reliefs granted under the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act.
A husband's imprisonment for non-payment does not absolve his obligation to pay maintenance; ongoing enforcement is essential to protect the recipient's welfare.
Judicial Magistrates have the authority to issue non-bailable warrants for recovery of maintenance under the Domestic Violence Act, and enforcement procedures can follow the Criminal Procedure Code.
Maintenance orders under the Protection of Women From Domestic Violence Act can be enforced through attachment of both movable and immovable property.
The DV Act provides a broad scope of monetary relief, including maintenance for aggrieved persons and their children, and establishes the independent right of unmarried daughters to obtain maintenanc....
Maintenance – Unmarried daughter, whether Hindu or Muslim has right to obtain maintenance, irrespective of her age – Courts have to look for other laws applicable when question pertains to right to b....
Allegations of domestic violence must be proven for entitlement to reliefs under the DV Act, and the court may consider the respondent's financial resources in determining maintenance allowance.
Non-payment of maintenance under the D.V. Act does not fall within penal provisions of Section 31, which strictly applies to violations of protection orders under Section 18.
Section 20(d) authorises a Magistrate to grant maintenance for aggrieved person as well as her children.
Violation of monetary orders under the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act does not constitute an offence under Section 31, which applies only to breaches of protection orders.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
