SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Ker) 982

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
ANIL K.NARENDRAN, MURALEE KRISHNA S., JJ.
Nitha.A.B., W/o Arun - Appellant 
Versus 
Kerala Devaswom Recruitment Board - Respondents  
WP(C) No. 25049 of 2024
Decided on : 13-02-2025

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant : BY ADV A.S.SHAMMY RAJ
For the Respondent: BY ADV. G.BIJU, SC FOR TRAVANCORE DEVASWOM BOARD SRI. V.V. NANDAGOPAL NAMBIAR, SC, KERALA DEVASWOM RECRUITMENT BOARD KISHORE D MEERA GOPINATH(K/001803/1999.) R.MURALEEKRISHNAN (MALAKKARA)(K/000583/2008)

Judicial review of selection processes is limited; courts cannot reassess candidates' merits unless there is proven bias or violation of statutory rules.

Headnote:(A) Constitution of India - Article 226 - Writ of certiorari - Writ petition filed to quash select list for Public Relations Officer post, alleging gender discrimination in marking - Court found no merit in claims of bias, emphasizing that reassessment of candidates' merits is impermissible unless statutory violations are proven - The selection process was conducted in accordance with the Kerala Devaswom Recruitment Board Rules, 2015. (Paras 1, 10, 12, 13)

(B) Judicial Review - The court reiterated that it cannot interfere in the selection process unless there are proven allegations of bias or violation of statutory rules. (Paras 12, 13)

Facts of the case:
The petitioner applied for the Public Relations Officer position, scored highest in the written test, but alleged discrimination in the interview process, claiming the board intentionally marked her down to prevent a female candidate from ranking first.

Findings of Court:
The court found no evidence of discrimination and upheld the selection process as valid.

Issues: The main issue was whether the selection process was tainted by gender discrimination and if the court should intervene in the interview board's assessment.

Ratio Decidendi: The court ruled that the selection committee's assessment is not subject to judicial review unless there is clear evidence of bias or statutory violations.

Result: Writ petition dismissed.

JUDGMENT :

Anil K. Narendran, J.

The petitioner, who submitted an application pursuant to Ext.P4 notification dated 11.10.2023 issued by the 1st respondent Kerala Devaswom Recruitment Board, for the post of Public Relations Officer in the 3rd respondent Travancore Devaswom Board, has filed this writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, seeking a writ of certiorari to quash Ext.P7 select list dated 02.07.2024 published by the 1st respondent Recruitment Board. The petitioner has also sought for a writ of mandamus commanding respondents 1 and 2 to conduct interview of the candidates afresh, in the presence of an Advocate Commissioner to be appointed by this Court.

2. Going by the averments in the writ petition, the petitioner applied for the post of Public Relations Officer in the 3rd respondent Devaswom Board. The 1st respondent Recruitment Board conducted a written test and interview on 18.02.2024 and 27.06.2024, respectively. The petitioner acquired the highest mark in the written test. But in order to avoid ladies coming to the said post, the interview board has given the least mark to the petitioner. None of the academic credentials or previous experiences of the petitioner were considered. Even though the petitioner answered all the questions asked in the interview, the interview board purposefully granted the least mark to her solely for avoiding a lady being placed in the top rank.

3. On 12.07.2024, when this writ petition came up for consideration before a learned Single Judge, it was submitted that identical cases are posted before the Division Bench dealing with Devaswom matters. Therefore, by the order dated 12.07.2024, this writ petition was directed to be listed before the Division Bench, after obtaining the orders of the Hon’ble the Chief Justice. Thereafter, after obtaining necessary orders, the writ petition is listed before the Division Bench on 18.07.2024.

4. On 19.07.2024, the learned counsel for the petitioner sought time to file an application to amend the writ petition. Thereafter, the petitioner filed I.A.Nos.1, 2 and 3 of 2024 seeking various interim reliefs. I.A.Nos.1 and 2 of 2024 were filed on 18.07.2024 and I.A.No.3 of 2024 was filed on 20.07.2024. Thereafter, the petitioner filed I.A.No.4 of 2024 on 20.07.2024 seeking an order to amend the writ petition, as stated in that interlocutory application. By the order dated 29.07.2024, I.A.Nos.1 and 2 of 2024 were closed and I.A.No.3 of 2024 was dismissed as not pressed. I.A.No.4 of 2024 filed by the petitioner seeking an order to implead the candidates, who are included in Ext.P7 select list, as additional respondents 4 to 14, and to amend the writ petition as stated in that interlocutory application, was allowed. The learned Standing Counsel for Devaswom Recruitment Board took notice for respondents 1 and 2 and the learned Standing Counsel for the Devaswom Board for the 3rd respondent. Urgent notice by speed post was ordered to additional respondents 4 to 14.

5. The 4th respondent has filed a counter affidavit dated23.08.2024, opposing the reliefs sought for in the writ petition, producing therewith Exts.R4(a) to R4(h) documents. Paragraphs6 to 9 of that counter affidavit read thus;

“6. It is submitted that this respondent is having vast experience in public relations. The 4th respondent has worked as a Journalist as Reporter/Sub Editor in Mathrubhumi News Channel and as a Sub Editor in the Information Public Relations Department, Government of Kerala. A true copy of the Certificate of Experience dated 8.12.2022 issued by the Manager-HR & Administration, Mathrubhumi News Channel to the 4th respondent is produced herewith and marked as Exhibit R4(c). The 4th respondent has also worked as a Sub Editor in the Information Public Relations Department for the period from 1.2.2022 to 31.1.2023 and from 21.3.2023 to 20.1.2024. A true copy of the Certificate of Experience dated 20.1.2024 issued by the Information Officer, Information Public Relations

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top