IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
P.V.KUNHIKRISHNAN, J
Jinachandran, S/o Sadanandan – Appellant
Versus
State Of Kerala – Respondent
ORDER :
This Bail Application is filed under Section 482 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita.
2. Petitioner is the 2nd accused in Crime No.1705/2024 of Kottayam East Police Station. The above case is registered against the petitioner alleging offences punishable under Sections 318(1) & 318(4) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (for short, BNS).
3. The prosecution case is that, with the dishonest and fraudulent intention of making wrongful gain, the petitioner, who is conducting the Brightway International at Dew Space, 5th floor, West Fort, Thrissur, deceived the defacto complainant by making him believe that he would be procured a job visa at Canada and induced him to pay Rs.1,50,000/- via account transfer on 06.02.2024 and 07.02.2024 to his account and thereafter, failed to procure the job visa as promised or to return the amount so obtained.
4. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Public Prosecutor.
5. The counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner is the 2nd accused and actually he has no involvement in this case. The transaction was between the defacto complainant and one Rajashekhar Menon. It is submitted that now the matter is settled and the d
Chidambaram. P v Directorate of Enforcement
Bail is the rule and jail is the exception; personal liberty must be prioritized unless justified by compelling reasons.
Bail is the rule and jail is the exception; courts must grant bail when conditions are met, ensuring fair trial rights.
Pre-arrest bail is not granted if there's a risk of interference with an investigation and if the allegations are serious.
Bail is the rule and jail is the exception; courts must grant bail unless compelling reasons exist to deny it.
Bail is the rule and jail is the exception; courts must grant bail when a case is made out, regardless of the seriousness of allegations.
Accused granted anticipatory bail considering circumstances and lack of evidence connecting them to the crime.
Court may grant pre-arrest bail when custodial interrogation is unnecessary, considering the nature of allegations and investigation status.
The court granted pre-arrest bail due to insufficient evidence for custodial interrogation while ensuring compliance with investigation protocols.
Bail is the rule and jail is the exception; arrest must be justified and not routine, emphasizing the importance of personal liberty.
Bail is the rule and jail is the exception; arrest must be justified and not routine.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.