IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
P.V.KUNHIKRISHNAN, J.
Sainul Abideen @ Kunjon - Appellant
Versus
State Of Kerala - Respondent
Bail Appl. No. 5251 of 2025
Decided on : 11-04-2025
(A) Kerala Abkari Act - Sections 55(a), 55(i), 55D, and 58 - Bail application filed under Section 483 - Petitioner, the 2nd accused, in custody since 22.03.2025 for possession of 50 litres of Indian Made Foreign Liquor - No criminal antecedents alleged against petitioner - Bail granted with stringent conditions. (Paras 2, 6, 10)
(B) Bail - Principle that bail is the rule and jail is the exception - Courts must grant bail when a case is made out, ensuring fair trial rights under Article 21 of the Constitution. (Paras 7, 8, 9)
Facts of the case:
The petitioner was arrested for possessing a significant quantity of contraband liquor, with no prior criminal record. The prosecution opposed bail, but the court found grounds for release.
Findings of Court:
The petitioner is granted bail under stringent conditions, including a bond and cooperation with the investigation.
Issues: The main issue was whether the petitioner should be granted bail despite the serious allegations.
Ratio Decidendi: The court emphasized that bail should be granted as a rule, not as a punishment, and that the absence of criminal antecedents supports this decision.
Result: Bail application allowed.
ORDER :
This Bail Application is filed under Section 483 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita.
2. Petitioner is the 2nd accused in Crime No.225/2025 of Kalladikkode Police Station. The above case is registered against the petitioner alleging offences punishable under Sections 55(a), 55(i), 55D and 58 of the Kerala Abkari Act.
3. The prosecution case is that on 22.03.2025, the accused was found in possession of 50 litres of Indian Made Foreign Liquor for sale in two cars. Hence, it is alleged that the accused committed the offences.
4. Heard counsel for the petitioner and the Public Prosecutor.
5. The counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner is the 2nd accused and he is in custody from 22.03.2025. The counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner is ready to abide any conditions, if this Court grants him bail. The Public Prosecutor opposed the bail application. But, the Public Prosecutor submitted that as per the report received by him, no criminal antecedents are alleged against the petitioner.
6. Admittedly, the contraband seized from the petitioner is Indian Made Foreign Liquor, which is available in market. But, it is true that huge quantity of Indian Made Foreign Liquor is seized. The petitioner is in custody from 22.03.2025. No criminal antecedents are alleged against the petitioner. Considering the facts and circumstances of this case, I think the petitioner can be released on bail, after imposing stringent conditions.
7. Moreover, it is a well accepted principle that the bail is the rule and the jail is the exception. The Hon'ble Supreme Court in Chidambaram. P v Directorate of Enforcement [2019 (16) SCALE 870], after considering all the earlier judgments, observed that, the basic jurisprudence relating to bail remains the same inasmuch as the grant of bail is the rule and refusal is the exception so as to ensure that the accused has the opportunity of securing fair trial.
8. Moreover, in Jalaluddin Khan v. Union of India [2024 KHC 6431], the Hon'ble Supreme Court observed that:
“21. Before we part with the Judgment, we must mention here that the Special Court and the High Court did not consider the material in the charge sheet objectively. Perhaps the focus was more on the activities of PFI, and therefore, the appellant's case could not be properly appreciated. When a case is made out for a grant of bail, the Courts should not have any hesitation in granting bail. The allegations of the prosecution may be very serious. But, the duty of the Courts is to consider the case for grant of bail in accordance with the law. "Bail is the rule and jail is an exception" is a settled law.
Even in a case like the present case where there are stringent conditions for the grant of bail in the relevant statutes, the same rule holds good with only modification that the bail can be granted if the conditions in the statute are satisfied. The rule also means that once a case is made out for the grant of bail, the Court cannot decline to grant bail. If the Courts start denying bail in deserving cases, it will be a violation of the rights guaranteed under Art.21 of our Constitution.” (underline supplied)
9. In Manish Sisodia v. Directorate of Enforcement [2024 KHC 6426], also the Hon'ble Supreme Court observed that:
“53. The Court further observed that, over a period of time, the trial courts and the High Courts have forgotten a very well - settled principle of law that bail is not to be withheld as a punishment. From our experience, we can say that it appears that the trial courts and the High Courts attempt to play safe in matters of grant of bail. The principle that bail is a rule and refusal is an exception is, at times, followed in breach. On account of non - grant of bail even in straight forward open and shut cases, this Court is flooded with huge number of bail petitions thereby adding to the huge pendency. It is high time that the trial courts and the High Courts should recognize the principle that "bail is rule and
Bail is the rule and jail is the exception; courts must grant bail when justified, ensuring fair trial rights under Article 21.
Bail is the rule and jail is the exception; courts must grant bail when justified, ensuring fair trial rights under Article 21.
Bail is the rule and jail is the exception; courts must grant bail when warranted, ensuring fair trial rights.
Bail granted due to completed investigation, no antecedents, and non-serious opposition by prosecution.
Bail may be granted if further detention is unnecessary and a fair investigation can be ensured through stringent conditions.
Granting bail under specific conditions considering judicial custody and investigation status.
The court grants bail considering the duration of judicial custody and ongoing investigation stage, establishing conditions for release.
The court's decision emphasizes the principles of pre-arrest bail under statutory guidelines, considering the absence of a criminal record and the nature of the allegations.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.