IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
MR.JUSTICE C.S.DIAS, J
Vandana Naik W/o M. Balaraj – Appellant
Versus
Revenue Divisional Officer, Kanhangad – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
1. The writ petition is filed to direct the respondent to consider Ext.P2 application (Form 6) submitted under Section 27A read with Rule 12(1) of the Kerala Conservation of Paddy Land and Wetland Act, 2008 and the Rules framed thereunder (in short ‘Act and Rules’) .
2. The petitioner is the owner in possession of 74.10 cents (29.99 Ares) of land in Hosdurg Village, Kasargod District. The petitioner’s property is a converted land prior to 12.08.2008. The petitioner with two others have constructed a hotel complex in the said property, as evident from Ext.P5 occupancy certificate. However, the revenue authorities have erroneously classified the land as paddy land and had included it in the data bank. Consequently, the petitioner had filed a Form 5 application under Rule 4(d) of the Rules and the same was allowed. Subsequently, the petitioner filed Ext.P2 application to change the nature of the land in the revenue records. But, by Ext.P3 order, the respondent returned the application, directing the petitioner to remit the requisite fee to call for a report from the Kerala State Remote Sensing and Environment Centre (in short ‘KSREC’). The procedure directed in Ext.P3 order i
The court held that the respondent's requirement for satellite images in processing a land classification application is illegal, emphasizing adherence to statutory procedures outlined in the Kerala ....
The evaluation of land suitability for paddy cultivation must be independent and adhere to prescribed procedures, not solely rely on LLMC reports.
The authority must directly inspect land or obtain satellite images to assess suitability for paddy cultivation before classifying it as 'nilam'.
The improper dismissal of land application violates procedural requirements under relevant statutes, necessitating reconsideration based on judicial precedent.
The court emphasized the necessity for proper inspection and application of law regarding land classification under the Kerala Conservation of Paddy Land and Wetland Act, 2008.
The Revenue Divisional Officer must independently assess land character for classification, not rely solely on external observations.
The classification of land under the Kerala Conservation of Paddy Land and Wetland Rules must be based on its suitability for paddy cultivation, requiring proper inspection and consideration of evide....
The authorized officer must follow statutory procedures without arbitrary reasons in land application rejections.
The Revising Officer exceeded jurisdiction by recalling an earlier order and neglecting proper procedural requirements, thus violating statutory mandates of the Kerala Conservation of Paddy Land and ....
The competent authority must decide statutory land classification applications within a reasonable time as mandated by law.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.