SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Ker) 1607

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM 
C.S. DIAS, J.
Vandana Naik W/o M. Balaraj - Appellant
Versus
The Revenue Divisional Officer, Kanhangad - Respondent
W.P. (C) No. 17771 of 2025
Decided On : 27-05-2025

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellants : Jawahar Jose, George James Vattathara, Gregory Prince Myladi
For the Respondent: Vidya Kuriakose

The court held that the respondent's requirement for satellite images in processing a land classification application is illegal, emphasizing adherence to statutory procedures outlined in the Kerala Conservation of Paddy Land and Wetland Act.

Headnote:

(A) Kerala Conservation of Paddy Land and Wetland Act, 2008 - Section 27A and Rule 12(1) - Writ petition filed to direct consideration of application for change of land use - Petitioner’s land erroneously classified as paddy land despite prior conversion - Respondent's order requiring satellite images for application processing deemed illegal and arbitrary - Court emphasizes the necessity of following prescribed procedures without imposing additional requirements. (Paras 1-9)

(B) Scope of enquiry - The court clarifies that the enquiry into applications under Form 6 is limited to assessing the impact on water flow to neighboring paddy fields, not on prior land conversion status. (Paras 8)

Facts of the case:
The petitioner owns land classified as paddy land despite prior conversion and seeks to change its classification through a Form 6 application. The respondent's order to obtain satellite images for processing the application is challenged.

Findings of Court:
The court finds the respondent's directive to obtain satellite images beyond the scope of the law and quashes the order.

Issues: The main issues include the legality of the respondent's requirement for satellite images and the proper procedure for changing land classification.

Ratio Decidendi: The court ruled that the respondent must adhere to the statutory procedures outlined in the Act and Rules without imposing additional requirements, reaffirming the limited scope of enquiry in such applications.

Result: Writ petition allowed.

JUDGMENT :

1. The writ petition is filed to direct the respondent to consider Ext.P2 application (Form 6) submitted under Section 27A read with Rule 12(1) of the Kerala Conservation of Paddy Land and Wetland Act, 2008 and the Rules framed thereunder (in short ‘Act and Rules’) .

2. The petitioner is the owner in possession of 74.10 cents (29.99 Ares) of land in Hosdurg Village, Kasargod District. The petitioner’s property is a converted land prior to 12.08.2008. The petitioner with two others have constructed a hotel complex in the said property, as evident from Ext.P5 occupancy certificate. However, the revenue authorities have erroneously classified the land as paddy land and had included it in the data bank. Consequently, the petitioner had filed a Form 5 application under Rule 4(d) of the Rules and the same was allowed. Subsequently, the petitioner filed Ext.P2 application to change the nature of the land in the revenue records. But, by Ext.P3 order, the respondent returned the application, directing the petitioner to remit the requisite fee to call for a report from the Kerala State Remote Sensing and Environment Centre (in short ‘KSREC’). The procedure directed in Ext.P3 order is not envisaged under the Act and Rules. Ext.P3 order is illegal and arbitrary.

3. Heard; the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Pleader.

4. It is not in dispute that, pursuant to Ext.P1 order, the petitioner's property was removed from the data bank. Subsequently, the petitioner had submitted Ext.P2 application, to change the nature of the land in the revenue records. However, the respondent has returned the application, directing him to pay the fee to obtain a report from the KSREC.

5. The procedure to change the nature of a property from the revenue records is envisaged under Section 27A read with Rule 12(1) of the Act and Rules.

6. It is apposite to refer to Sub-Sections (1) to (4) of Section 27A and Sub-rules (1) to (5) of Rule 12, which are relevant for this case and read as follows:

(A) Section 27A Change of nature of unnotified land.--

(1) If any owner of an unnotified land desires to utilise such land for residential or commercial or for other purpose, he shall apply to the Revenue Divisional Officer for permission in such manner as may be prescribed.

(2) Notwithstanding anything contained in any judgment, decree or order of any Court or Tribunal or any other authority, the Revenue Divisional Officer may, after considering the reports of the Village Officer concerned, pass such orders as deemed fit and proper on such applications, ensuring that there is no disruption to the free flow of water to the neighbouring paddy lands, if any, through such water conservancy measures as is deemed necessary:

Provided that, if the area of such parcel of land where the application is allowed is more than 20.2 Ares, ten per cent of such land shall be set apart for water conservancy measures.

(3) If the application is allowed, the applicant shall be liable to pay a fee at such rate as may prescribed:

Provided that, no such fee shall be collected if the applicant proves that the land where the application is allowed is, filled up or naturally filled up before the 4th day of July, 1967, the date of commencement of the Kerala Land Utilisation Order, 1967, after completing such procedure, as may be prescribed.

(4) If the application is allowed, the Revenue Divisional Officer shall ensure that the reclamation of the unnotified land shall not adversely affect the cultivation of paddy or any other crops, if any, in the adjoining land and shall specify such water conservancy measures as is necessary to ensure such cultivation:

Provided that in specifying such water conservancy measures, the Revenue Divisional Officer may, if he deems fit, refer to satellite maps of the area maintained by Government agencies.

(B) Rule 12. The procedure for permitting change in nature of unnotified lands as per Sub Section (2) of Section 27A.

(1) In the case of an applica

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top