SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Ker) 1985

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM 
RAJA VIJAYARAGHAVAN V, K. V. JAYAKUMAR, JJ.
Anjaneyalu S/o. Nadipe Naganna - Appellant
Vs.
Union Of India - Respondent
CRL.A NO. 932 OF 2025
Decided On : 30-06-2025

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant : SHRI.KALEESWARAM RAJ KUM.THULASI K. RAJ SMT.CHINNU MARIA ANTONY SMT.APARNA NARAYAN MENON
For the Respondent: O.M.SHALINA, DEPUTY SOLICITOR GENERAL OF INDIA

Prolonged pre-trial detention violates the right to life and liberty; bail may be granted even for serious charges if trial delay is substantial.

Headnote:(A) National Investigation Agency Act, 2008 - Section 21 - Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act, 1967 - Sections 18, 18A, 18B, 20, 38, 39 - Bail application by accused charged with conspiracy and recruitment for a terrorist organization - Prior applications for bail rejected based on prima facie case - Court held prolonged pre-trial detention infringes the right to life and liberty under Article 21 - Further, in absence of any terrorist act committed, and due to lengthy incarceration, bail granted with specific conditions. (Paras 6, 7.1-7.12)

(B) Article 21 - Right to Speedy Trial - Courts cannot deny bail solely based on the seriousness of charges if trial delays infringe constitutional rights; balance must be maintained. (Paras 7.10-7.12)

Facts of the case:
The appellant, charged as a member of a terrorist organization, remained in custody for over three years without trial, prompting repeated bail applications. The Special Court refused bail on grounds of the serious nature of allegations.

Findings of Court:
The appeal against the denial of bail was allowed due to prolonged pre-trial detention and lack of evidence of any recent terrorist act.

Issues: The primary issues included whether the prolonged detention violated the appellant’s right to life and personal liberty and whether existing evidence warranted bail.

Ratio Decidendi: The court emphasized the importance of the right to a speedy trial under Article 21, stating that excessive detention without trial could necessitate granting bail despite serious allegations.

Result: Appeal allowed; bail granted with conditions.

Table of Content
1. charges against the appellant involve terrorism-related conspiracy. (Para 1)
2. allegations of recruitment for terrorism. (Para 2)
3. charges against the appellant under ua(p) act. (Para 3)
4. arguments for bail based on prolonged detention. (Para 4)
5. prosecution's opposition to bail. (Para 5)
6. legal standards on bail related to constitutional rights and trial timing. (Para 6)
7. court's analysis of bail application. (Para 7)
8. court's decision to grant bail. (Para 8)

JUDGMENT :

Raja Vijayaraghavan, J.

The above captioned Criminal Appeal is preferred by the 2nd accused in S.C.No.3/2022/NIA challenging the order dated 20.3.2025 in Crl. M.P.No.20/2025 on the file of the Special Court for Trial of NIA cases, as per which the application for regular bail preferred by the appellant was dismissed.

2. Gist of the prosecution allegation

2.1. Credible information was allegedly received by the Central Government concerning the involvement of a) Sanjay Deepak Rao @ Vikas, a Central Committee Member of the Western Ghats Special Zonal Committee (WGSZC) of the proscribed terrorist organization CPI (Maoist); b) Pinaka Pani @ Pani and Varalakshmi, members of the Revolutionary Writers Association, a frontal organization of CPI (Maoist) operating in Andhra Pradesh; c) Sreekanth of Wayanad; and d) Anjayanelu @ Anji @ Sudhakar of Andhra Pradesh, along with others were making efforts to radicalise Chaithanya @ Surya with a view to recruit him into the the proscribed terrorist organization CPI(Maoist) and to provide training with the objective to carry out acts so as to threaten the security, unity, integrity, and sovereignty of the Union of India.

2.2. Considering the grave nature of the offence and the opinion that a scheduled offence under the National Investigation Agency Act (hereinafter referred to as ‘NIA Act’) had been committed, the Ministry of Home Affairs, Government of India ordered the registration of a Crime by the NIA and consequently RC01/2022/NIA/KOC was registered under Sections 18, 18A, 18B, 20, 38 & 39 of the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act, 1967 & Section 120B of the Indian Penal Code. The accused in the above crime registered by the NIA on 03.02.2022 are Sanjay Deepak Rao (A-1), Pinakapani (A-2), Varalakshmi (A-3), Sreekanth (A-4), Chaithanya (A-5) and Anjayanelu (A-6).

2.3. On completion of the investigation, a report was laid initially on 3.9.2022 before the NIA Special Court, arraying Chaithanya @ Surya (A-5) and Anjayanelu @ Sudhakar @ Anji (A-6) as the accused and the same was taken on file on 22.9.2022.

2.4. Investigation was carried out against the rest of the accused. A Supplementary Final Report was submitted arraying Sanjay Deepak Rao (A-1) on 05.07.2024.

2.5. In the course of the further investigation, it was revealed that in addition to the accused already arrayed, certain others were also involved. The NIA, based on investigation, concluded that (i) Akki Raju Hargopal (ii) Bussireddy Kondareddy, (iii) BG Krishnamurthy and (iv) R. Ragaveendran played a pivotal role in the conspiracy to recruit Chaithanya (A-5) and Anjayanelu (A-6) to the Western Ghats Special Zone Committee of the proscribed terrorist organisation CPI (Maoist). Accordingly, the original status of the accused was rearranged as Akki Raju Hargopal (A-1), Sanjay Deepak Rao (A-2), Pinakapani (A-3), Varalakshmi (A-4), Bussireddy Kondareddy (A-5), R. Ragaveendran (A-6), BG Krishnamurthy (A-7), Sreekanth (A-8) Chaithanya (A-9) and Anjayanelu (A-10).

3. The Charge against the appellant .

3.1. As per the Charge, the specific allegation is that the appellant Velagutra Anjayanelu @ V Anjineyulu Velugutra @ Anjaneyalu @ Sudhakar @ Anji (A-6) became an active member of CPI (Maoist) through its frontal organization PKS (Prakuthiseela Karmika Samakya) of Andhra Pradesh and attended various classes and meetings of frontal organizations of the proscribed terrorist organisation CPI (Maoist) conducted by Pinakapani (A-2) and Varalakshmi (A-3) during 2017-2

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top