SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Ker) 2135

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
RAJA VIJAYARAGHAVAN V, K. V. JAYAKUMAR, JJ.
T.K. Rajeevan, S/o Krishnan - Appellant  
Versus  
Union Of India - Respondent 
Crl.A No. 1172 of 2025
Decided on : 14-08-2025

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant : SHRI.KALEESWARAM RAJ, KUM.THULASI K. RAJ, SMT.APARNA NARAYAN MENON
For the Respondent: O.M.SHALINA

Prolonged pre-trial detention without reasonable trial prospects warrants constitutional safeguards, allowing for bail despite stringent statutory requirements under UAPA.

Headnote:(A) Indian Penal Code - Sections 120B, 121, 121A, 122 - Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act, 1967 - Sections 18, 18A, 20, 38, 39 - Kerala Forest Act - Section 27(1)(e)(iv) - Arms Act - Section 7 r/w 27(2) - Discharge of accused for serious terrorist-related charges pending trial - Mandatory sanction required under UAPA not obtained, leading to assertion of violation of Article 21 and grounds for bail. (Paras 1, 5, 19).

(B) Bail - Prolonged incarceration of 4 years and 8 months without trial constitutes violation of constitutional rights under Article 21, necessitating consideration for pre-trial release. (Paras 12, 19).

Facts of the case:
The appellant was arrested in 2020 for membership and activities related to a proscribed terrorist organization, facing multiple serious charges, and has remained in custody while trial has not commenced. (Paras 2, 19).

Findings of Court:
The trial is unlikely to be completed within a reasonable timeframe, thereby justifying bail despite the severity of charges. (Paras 19, 20).

Issues: The court primarily addressed the violation of the right to a speedy trial and grounds for granting bail based on prolonged detention. (Paras 12, 19).

Ratio Decidendi: The court emphasized the need to safeguard constitutional rights against prolonged detention, allowing bail despite statutory provisions that typically restrict it. (Paras 12, 19).

Result: The bail application is allowed, releasing the appellant with conditions. (Para 20).

Table of Content
1. facts of the case and criminal charges. (Para 1 , 2 , 3)
2. arguments on the appellant's prolonged custody and lack of prima facie case. (Para 4 , 5 , 6 , 7)
3. prosecution's claims of credible evidence and danger of bail. (Para 8 , 9)
4. court's observations on the length of custody and trial status. (Para 10 , 11)
5. legal precedents on the right to bail and article 21. (Para 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19)
6. court's order granting bail with conditions. (Para 20)

JUDGMENT :

K. V. Jayakumar, J.

This criminal appeal is preferred by the 5th accused in Crl.M.P.No.214/2025 in S.C.No.2/2021 pending before the Special Court for Trial of NIA Cases, Ernakulam. The appellant, along with others, was discharged for the offences punishable under Section 120B, 121, 121A, 122 of the Indian Penal Code, Sections 18 , 18A, 20, 38 and 39 of the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act, 1967 [‘UA (P) Act’, for the sake of brevity], Section 27(1)(e)(iv) of the KERALA FOREST ACT and Section 7 r/w 27(2) of the ARMS ACT .

2. The prosecution case in brief is that, the accused, T. K. Rajeevan @ Manoj @ Udayan @ Ajmal, being a member of the proscribed terrorist organisation CPI(Maoist) and the South Zonal Committee member of proscribed terrorist organisation CPI(Maoist), conspired with co-accused inside the deep reserve forest of Malappuram District of Kerala on different occasions in the year 2016, for conducting and participating in physical and arms training so as to commit terrorist acts and to wage war against the Government of India, collected arms and men and abetted waging war. Being a member of proscribed terrorist organisation CPI(Maoist) which is involved in terrorist acts, he along with co-accused trespassed into the reserve forest of Malappuram District and he actively participated and supervised the physical and arms training using prohibited arms imparted to co-accused, in the period between last week of May 2016 to last week of September 2016, to strengthen the proscribed terrorist organisation with intention to commit terrorist acts for furthering the activities of CPI(Maoist) and thereby to wage war against the Government of India.

3. The case was registered on the basis of the information given by the first accused, Kalidas, when he was arrested by the DySP, Agali on 21.09.2017 in connection with crime No.153/2017 of Sholayur Police Station. An investigation was conducted by the Edakkara Police by registering crime No.249/2017 against 19 persons. Later, the case was handed over to the Anti-Terrorist Squad Police Station, Ernakulam, and renumbered as crime No.32/2020/ATS on 19.03.2020. The Anti-Terrorist Squad laid chargesheet against 5 accused before the District and Sessions Court, Manjeri on 18.05.2021. Thereafter, the Government of India, as per order dated 19.08.2021 directed the NIA to take over the investigation, and the case was re-registered in the present number and transferred to the Special Court for trial of NIA cases, Ernakulam. The NIA also filed a supplementary chargesheet on 24.03.2022 in the above case.

4. Sri. Kaleeswaram Raj, learned counsel for the appellant, submitted that the appellant was arrested in the above case on 20.11.2020 and is in judicial custody till date. It is submitted that the appellant has been in judicial custody for the past four years and 8 months in the High Security Prison, Viyyur. The trial of the case has not yet commenced.

5. The learned counsel submitted that no prima facie case has been established against the appellant, and that the mandatory sanction required under Section 45 (2) of the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act was not obtained before the prosecution of the appellant. The learned counsel further pointed out that the appellant is 53 years old and is the sole breadwinner of his family, which comprises his wife and a son studying in the 7th standard. His wife, who belongs to a tribal community, is currently suffering from hypothyroidism and is unable to wor

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top