SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(Ker) 1139

HIGH COURT OF KERALA
,
SATHEESH VENUGOPALAN – Appellant
Versus
RISHAJ – Respondent


JUDGMENT :

P.B. Suresh Kumar, J.

1. This appeal under Section 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (the Act) is directed against the order dated 20.10.2020 in O.P. (Arbitration) No.557 of 2015 on the files of the Court of the Third Additional District Judge, Thrissur. The appellants were the petitioners in the said proceedings.

2. There were two partnership firms namely, Moonwalk Polymers and Butterfly Micro Polymers in which the appellants and respondent were partners. The case of the respondent is that he being a person working abroad, the affairs of the firms were being looked after by the appellants; that when the firms could not carry on their business due to paucity of funds, he made advances to the appellants on different occasions commencing from 02.07.2009 totalling to Rs.1.62 crores for the business on an understanding that the appellants will return the same with interest and that he has come to know in course of time that the appellants have practised fraud on him by diverting the amounts given to them for the business of the firms. It is also the case of the respondent that an agreement was arrived at in the said circumstances between the parties on 19.11.2010

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top