Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
Amit Rawal, J, Easwaran S.,J
Panachika Palliyali Juma-Ath Palli Paripalana Committee – Appellant
Versus
Vattola Aboobacker S/o Marakkarutty – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. amendments to the bye-law challenged. (Para 2 , 3) |
| 2. arguments on amendment validity presented. (Para 6 , 7) |
| 3. jurisdiction of wakf tribunal analyzed. (Para 9 , 10 , 11) |
| 4. dispute does not relate to wakf property. (Para 12 , 13 , 14 , 15) |
| 5. no locus standi for non-members. (Para 16 , 17) |
| 6. insufficient grounds to challenge by-laws. (Para 18 , 19 , 20) |
| 7. religious rights unaffected by amendments. (Para 21 , 22) |
| 8. tribunal's error acknowledged; suit dismissed. (Para 23 , 24) |
ORDER :
1. The defendants 1 to 3 in WOS No.114 of 2019 on the files of the Wakf Tribunal, Kozhikode are the revision petitioners.
2. The brief facts for the disposal of the case are as follows:-
Respondents 1 to 3/plaintiffs approached the Wakf Tribunal seeking a declaration that the amendments brought to the bye-law of the 1st defendant-Society is null and void and not binding on the members of the 1st defendant – Society and for consequential reliefs. The 1st defendant is a Society registered under the provisions of the Societies Registration Act of 1860. The plaintiffs/respondents 1 to 3 herein approached the Wakf Tribunal on the pretext that the 1st defendant – Society, which is managing the Wa
The Wakf Tribunal lacks jurisdiction in disputes concerning internal management of societies; only members can challenge by-law amendments.
The court established that membership eligibility in a society is governed by its bye-laws, and individuals cannot claim membership rights without meeting the stipulated criteria. Additionally, the c....
The main legal point established in the judgment is the exclusive jurisdiction of the Waqf Board in managing waqf properties, as well as the inapplicability of the Societies Registration Act, 1860 in....
Wakf properties – Jurisidction of wakf tribunal - merely because the present petitioner as defendant No.1 appears to have participated in the proceedings and contested the suit before the Tribunal, b....
The Waqf Board can only manage waqf under its authority if no existing court scheme is in place; otherwise, modifications require State Government action.
A society, as a juristic person, must be represented by the appropriate persons to maintain a writ petition under the Wakf Act, lacking locus standi otherwise.
The court established that beneficiaries can directly approach the Wakf Tribunal if the mutawalli neglects their duties regarding encroachments on Wakf property.
(1) Jurisdiction of Wakf Tribunal – Injunction simpliciter sought for before Tribunal does not fall within its jurisdiction and plaint has to be rejected.(2) An Amendment will be retrospective only ....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
