Back
RAVI CHEEMALAPATI
Masjid A Noor Committee – Appellant
Versus
State of Andhra Pradesh – Respondent
ORDER:
The present Writ Petition is filed by the petitioner under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, seeking the following relief:
2. The case of the petitioner, in brief, is that the petitioner society was established prior to 1999 with an object to establish a mosque and accordingly the president of the society purchased Ac.0.14 ¼ cents under an agreement of sale dated 03.06.1999 and later sold Ac.0.03 cents out of it to pay the sale consideration. Later, the society with its own money and also by collecting donations constructed Masjid-A-Noor in the said Ac.0.11 ¼ cents site including compound wall and ever since the society has been looking after t
A society, as a juristic person, must be represented by the appropriate persons to maintain a writ petition under the Wakf Act, lacking locus standi otherwise.
The main legal point established in the judgment is the importance of fair panels and the mandatory election process under Section 5(2) of the Andhra Pradesh Wakfs Managing Committee Regulations, 200....
The main legal point established in the judgment is the exclusive jurisdiction of the Waqf Board in managing waqf properties, as well as the inapplicability of the Societies Registration Act, 1860 in....
The Board has the power to appoint a Mutawalli under Section 42 of the Wakf Act, 1954, when there is a vacancy in the office of the Mutawalli and there is no one to be appointed under the terms of th....
The Wakf Tribunal lacks jurisdiction in disputes concerning internal management of societies; only members can challenge by-law amendments.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
