Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
NITIN JAMDAR, C.J., S.MANU
State Of Kerala – Appellant
Versus
T.K.I. Ahamed Sherief – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. appointment of inquiry commission by state under act 60 of 1952. (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. challenges to legality and authority of state's notification. (Para 4 , 10 , 12 , 16 , 17) |
| 3. court's analysis on legality of the commission and its powers. (Para 5 , 6 , 8 , 9 , 11 , 14 , 15 , 18) |
| 4. scope of governmental power in appointing a commission. (Para 13 , 19) |
| 5. court's interim order and stay on the earlier judgment. (Para 20 , 21) |
ORDER :
Nitin Jamdar, C. J.
These two appeals filed by the State of Kerala arise from the common judgment of the learned Single Judge dated 17 March 2025 in W.P.(C) Nos.2839 and 3817 of 2025.
2. The Government of Kerala was of the opinion that it is necessary to appoint a Commission of Inquiry to recommend measures to be taken by the Government to find a permanent solution in the matter of ongoing dispute between the citizens residing in Munambam at Ernakulam District and the Waqf Board. Accordingly, considering that this enquiry was into a matter of public importance, the Government of Kerala, in exercise of the powers conferred under Section 3 of the Commissions of Inquiry Act, 1952 (Act 60 of 1952), appointed a retired Judge of this Court as the
The exercise of statutory power under the Commissions of Inquiry Act must be justified by valid legal grounds, distinguishing between personal injury claims and public interest allegations for determ....
The appointment of a Commission of Inquiry by the State Government regarding waqf property is invalid as it violates the provisions of the Waqf Act, 1995, which prohibits any authority from adjudicat....
A Commission of Inquiry does not cease to exist upon submitting its report unless formally terminated by the government under Section 7 of the Commissions of Inquiry Act, 1952.
The constitution of an inquiry commission by the State is valid despite challenges under the Waqf Act, 1995 when prior waqf declarations are arbitrary, devoid of proper procedure, and the property in....
The court determined that a 41-year delay in issuing a notification declaring land as wakf property was unreasonable, rendering it invalid, and affirmed that such matters could be addressed in writ p....
A challenge to a long-standing notification under the Muslim Wakfs Act after an undue delay is impermissible, reinforcing the finality of administrative actions.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
