SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Ker) 2247

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
AMIT RAWAL, MURALEE KRISHNA S., JJ.
M/s. Puravankara Projects Limited - Appellant
Versus
Meethian Kunju M.M. S/o M.M. Mohammed - Respondent
W.A. No. 349 of 2017
Decided On : 17-07-2025

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellants : Krishnan Venugopal, Anu Monga, Rahul Goel, Shobhit Sharma, Jolly John, Liza Meghan Cyriac, Irene Babu, Mehnaz P. Mohammed, Harikrishna S.
For the Respondents: S. Jamal, T. Ramprasad Unni, K. Ramakumar, Shehin S., Devika S., T.K. Vipindas, Reshma Das P.

NOCs issued before KMBR enforcement retain validity; builders can apply for renewal under Rule 15A despite obtained NOC, which does not equate to a permit.

Headnote:(A) Kerala Municipality Building Rules (KMBR), 1999 - Rule 15A - Kerala Panchayat Raj Act, 1994 - Intra court appeal challenging the Single Bench's judgment regarding a building permit - The appellant's construction of a multi-storied building is contested on grounds of NOC validity and KMBR applicability. The government circulars granting latitude for construction under NOCs are debated. The Single Bench ruled that the appellant's NOC does not equate to a permit required under KMBR, and thus, the requirement for application under Rule 15A was not met. On appeal, the court held that the previous NOC retains its validity and should allow for construction continuation subject to necessary permit fees. (Paras 1-41)

(B) It was determined that the validity of NOCs issued before the enforcement of KMBR does not cease, thereby entitling the builder to seek permit under Rule 15A. The Single Bench's findings were found incorrect in treating NOC as invalid. (Paras 14-41)

Table of Content
1. intra court appeal against single bench judgment regarding building permits. (Para 1 , 2)
2. background on issuance and challenges to building permits and nocs. (Para 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7)
3. legal interpretation of noc and the applicability of kmbr. (Para 8 , 26)
4. arguments regarding the nature and validity of noc vs permits. (Para 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 14)
5. judgment's decision to set aside prior ruling and uphold building permit. (Para 13 , 15 , 16 , 39 , 40 , 41)

JUDGMENT :

AMIT RAWAL, J.

1. The present intra court appeal is directed against the judgment of the Single Bench dated 02.12.2016 in W.P.(C)No.16368 of 2013 preferred by the respondents - petitioners. Appellant is the respondent No.3 in the aforementioned writ petition.

2. The claim of the respondents - writ petitioners in brief is enumerated hereinbelow:

Petitioners are the residents of old Ward No.10 Division No.37 of the Thrikkakara Municipality and were aggrieved of the issuance of building permit under the Kerala Municipality Building Rules to the 3rd respondent i.e., the appellant herein for undertaking the construction under the name and style "Purava Moonreach Projects limited". The grievance aforementioned was based upon following averments:

(i) There was a proposal to construct apartments in two blocks in a parcel of land having an extent of 1.69 Acres with one block of 30 floors excluding the two level basement parking and another block of 22 floors excluding the two level basement parking. The preliminary earthwork at the site started in April-May 2007. The stage of construction was demonstrated from the photographs taken by the respondents in 2008, Ext.P2.

(ii) Government of Kerala in exercise of powers conferred under Section 274 of the Panchayat Raj Act extended the applicability of the provisions of Kerala Municipality Building Rules (hereinafter called 'KMBR' for short) to the Thrikkakara Panchayat by issuing Government order dated 06.11.2006 notified on 15.11.2006. On the basis of the information received under the Right to Information Act, it was informed by the Panchayat that the appellant - 3rd respondent was in the process of constructing a building having total build up area of 1,75,368.6 sq.ft. upon a place of property having an extent 1.69 Acres and since the KMBR was not in force before 06.11.2006, the permit was issued to the appellant - 3rd respondent on 31.01.2006 in the shape of NOC and the maximum Floor Area Ratio (FAR) permissible under the KMBR at the relevant point of time was 2.5 and the maximum area that can be constructed in a plot having an extent of 1.69 Acre is 1,81,844 sq. ft.

(iii) On receipt of the aforementioned information, a representation dated 31.12.207 was submitted to the Secretary, Thrikkakara Panchayat Ext.P4, to the District Collector Ext.P5 and also to the Minister for Local Self Government Ext.P6.

(iv) Government had issued a circular dated 03.07.2007 with a clarification regarding the extension of Building Rules to the Thrikkakara Grama Panchayat Ext.P7 and as per the circular, the Secretary of the Grama Panchayat was required to verify the stages of construction in respect of the buildings 'under construction' irrespective of whether No Objection Certificate(NOC) was issued by the Panchayat or not. If there were any construction activities going on as on 03.07.2007, the details of the said construction would have to be entered in the register maintained in the manner provided in the circular and in respect of the building for which though NOC had been obtained but construction did not commence, it was required to obtain permission under the KMBR. As per the advertisement published by the appellant – 3rd respondent, the apartment complex was one of the tallest apartment complexes in the State of Kerala having two blocks.

(v) Owing to such act of the Panchayat as well as appellant – respondent No.3, respondents – writ petitioners preferred W.P.(C)No.9903 of 2008 before this Court. During the pendency of the

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top