Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
RAJA VIJAYARAGHAVAN V.,
V.P. Nandakumar, S/o. Padmanabhan – Appellant
Versus
Deputy Director, Directorate Of Enforcement, Cochin – Respondent
ORDER :
RAJA VIJAYARAGHAVAN V., J.
The petitioners herein have been arrayed as accused Nos.1 and 2 in the Enforcement Case Information Report (‘ECIR’ for the sake of brevity) registered by the Enforcement Directorate (‘ED’ for the sake of brevity) as ECIR/36/KCZO/2022 dated 06.09.2022. They have approached this Court seeking to quash the ECIR and all further proceedings pursuant thereto.
2. The petitioner asserts that the aforementioned ECIR arose following the registration of Crime No.376/2022 at the Valappad Police Station, which pertains to an alleged offence under Section 420 of the IPC. It was consequent to the registration of the FIR at the instance of a certain P.K. Sagar that ECIR/36/KCZO/2022 dated 06.09.2022 was drawn up, invoking the provisions of the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002 (PMLA, 2002).
3. The petitioners contend that immediately after the registration of the FIR, both the petitioners and the complainant arrived at an amicable settlement and decided to resolve the issues. The petitioners approached this Court and instituted Crl.M.C.No. 4436/2022, seeking to quash all further proceedings. This Court, after getting the response from the complainant and the S
Money laundering proceedings under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act cannot be sustained without a validly registered predicate offense; if the predicate offense is quashed, so are the related m....
Section 66(1) of the PMLA prescribes the obligations of Enforcement Directorate (ED) to provide or facilitate the provision of pertinent information to designated government entities when such inform....
The court established that the offense of money laundering under PMLA cannot exist independently of a scheduled offense.
FIR and ECIR become two different documents and both tend to take shape on its own, independent of each other.
A quashed FIR does not automatically invalidate an ECIR; the ECIR is independent and requires substantive grounds for quashing based on the merits of the predicate offence under PMLA.
The presence of a scheduled offence legitimizes the existence of an ECIR and allows the department to continue the investigation. However, the settlement or quashing of scheduled offences in FIRs pro....
The Prevention of Money Laundering Act proceedings cannot survive if the predicate offences linked to them are closed by the court, indicating the non-existence of 'proceeds of crime'.
Without a predicate offense, proceedings under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act cannot be sustained, as established by the Supreme Court.
Prosecution under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002 is not sustainable without a registered scheduled offence, as established by the Supreme Court in Vijay Madanlal Choudhary.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
