IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
M.A. ABDUL HAKHIM
Shwas Builders and Developers Pvt. Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
Premchand Surendran – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
M.A. ABDUL HAKHIM, J.
1. The respondents 1 to 4 in Complaint No.37/2023 of the Kerala Real Estate Regulatory Authority (the K-RERA) are the appellants in the Miscellaneous Second Appeal filed under Section 58 of the Real Estate (Regulation and Development Act, 2006 (the RERA). The respondent is the complainant in the said complaint.
2. The parties are referred to according to their status before the K-RERA.
3. The complainant is an allottee in the Villa Project by name ‘Epcot County’ launched by the 1st respondent. The 1st respondent is a private limited company engaged in the business of development and construction of real estate projects. The respondents 2 to 4 are its Directors. The 4th respondent is the landowner of the Project also. The 5th respondent is another private limited company, which is a sister concern of the 1st respondent.
4. The complainant filed the complaint claiming amounts under various heads from the respondents alleging various defects, deficiency and delay from the part of the respondents with respect to the real estate project.
5. When the complaint was taken on file, the K-RERA found that the Real Estate Project of the 1st respondent requires regi
The Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act mandates registration for ongoing projects, where completion certificates are absent, emphasizing consumer protection in real estate transactions.
The court affirmed that ongoing real estate projects must be registered under RERA to protect allottee interests, regardless of title transfer.
The main legal point established in the judgment is the retrospective or retroactive operation of RERA, 2016, and the mandatory registration requirement for ongoing projects with completion certifica....
Complaints under RERA can only be filed for projects capable of registration; lack of necessary permissions renders a project unregistrable, barring complaints.
Section 35 deals with powers of authority to call for information and conduct investigation.
The court clarified that the Completion Certificate's issuance date is crucial in determining a project's ongoing status under RERA, emphasizing the conjunctive reading of statutory provisions.
The main legal point established in the judgment is the interpretation of the exemption from registration under RERA and the applicability of RERA provisions to unregistered real estate projects.
The Act, 2016 is retroactive in operation, and the court clarified the requirements for project registration, the validity of completion certificates, and the procedure for imposing penalties.
The existence and date of issuance of occupancy certificates are critical in determining whether a real estate project is ongoing under the RERA.
Non-compliance with regulatory requirements justifies classification as an 'ongoing project' under applicable law.
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.