SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Ker) 1683

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
MURALI PURUSHOTHAMAN, J.
Ashwin Sidharthan S/o Vattaparambil Kunjayyappan Sidharthan – Appellant
Versus
Cherpu Grama Panchayath – Respondent
W.P. (C) No. 1944 of 2024
Decided On : 19-02-2024

Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellants : E. Adithyan, Meera Ramesh, Treesa Manjila
For the Respondents: R. Rajpradeep, G. Sheeba

The court determined that the last Higher Secondary Examination Certificate should govern the correction of names in the birth certificate, overriding earlier School records.

Headnote:(A) Registration of Births and Deaths Act, 1969 - Correction of name in Birth Certificate - The petitioner's request to correct his name from 'ASE' to 'Ashwin Sidharthan' was denied based on discrepancies with school records - The court ruled that the last School record, namely the Higher Secondary Examination Certificate, should be given precedence for the correction - The relevant clarification from the Chief Registrar allows prior name changes in line with school records - Court directed reconsideration of the name change application within two weeks. (Paras 1-6)

(B) Educational Records - The importance of official educational documents in legal identity verification was emphasized, determining the authority they hold in name corrections. (Paras 6)

(C) Medical Records - The role of birth hospital records in establishing birth identity was discussed, clarifying that subsequent records may take precedence based on their content. (Paras 4, 5)

Table of Content
1. petitioner's name correction request due to discrepancies. (Para 1 , 2 , 3)
2. respondents argue name consistent with school records. (Para 4)
3. court analysis on name change regulations under law. (Para 5 , 6)
4. court orders reconsideration of name correction request. (Para 7)

JUDGMENT :

MURALI PURUSHOTHAMAN, J.

1. The petitioner states that he was born at Cherpu Government Hospital on 31.10.1982. At the time of his birth, his name was mistakenly entered as 'ASE' in the Birth Register maintained by the 1st respondent Panchayat. Ext. P3 is the copy of the Birth Certificate. The petitioner had his secondary schooling at VIPS School, Dubai which is now defunct. In the Secondary School Records, his name is entered as ‘Ase V.Sidharthan’ as seen from Ext. P4 copy of the Secondary School Leaving Certificate (SSLC) issued by the Board of Public Examinations, Kerala. However, in Ext. P5 Higher Secondary Examination (Class XII) Certificate issued by the Board of Higher Secondary Examination, Government of Kerala, his name is entered as 'Ashwin Sidharthan', which, according to him, is the correct name and is consistent with public documents such as Passport, PAN Card, Driving Licence etc.

2. The petitioner has been working in Switzerland for the past ten years. When he made application for citizenship, the authorities noted a disparity in his name between the Birth Certificate and Passport. Therefore, the petitioner submitted Ext. P7 application before the 3rd respondent, the Secretary, who is the Registrar of the 1st respondent Panchayat under the Registration of Births and Deaths Act, 1969, to correct the name in the Birth Certificate. However, the application was rejected by Ext. P8 communication stating that the name of the petitioner differs in the school record produced along with the same. It is stated that the name of the petitioner is entered as 'ASE' in the Birth Register, whereas, it is entered as Ase V.Sidharthan’ in the SSLC book and that the name entered in the Birth Certificate can only be corrected to match the name as entered in the SSLC book.

3. The petitioner states that he is known as 'Ashwin Sidharthan' among his family, friends, and society. Furthermore, in all official records such as Passport, PAN Card, Driving Licence etc., his name is entered as 'Ashwin Sidharthan'. Accordingly, challenging Ext. P8, the petitioner has approached this Court.

4. A counter affidavit has been filed on behalf of respondents 1 and 2 wherein it is stated that the name of the petitioner entered in the Birth Register (Ext. R3 (a) is the relevant extract) and the Labour Room Register (Ext. R3(b)is the relevant extract) of the Hospital where he was born is 'ASE'. It is further stated that, the Chief Registrar of Births and Deaths, Kerala has issued Ext. R3(c) Circular clarifying that the name entered in the Birth Register can be changed once, exactly like that of the school records of the child for whom the name is to be changed. Therefore, it is contended that, since Ext. P4 SSLC certificate, the basic school record shows his name as Ase V.Sidharthan’ his name cannot be changed as 'Ashwin Sidharthan' in the Birth Register, as it is not consistent with the school record.

5. Heard Sri. E. Adithyan, the learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri. P. Rajpradeep, the learned Standing Counsel for respondents 1 and 3. Notice to the 2nd respondent was dispensed with and the said respondent is suo motu impleaded in her official capacity as additional 3rd respondent.

6. The name of the petitioner entered in the Birth Register is 'ASE'. In Ext. P4 Secondary School Leaving Certificate, his name is shown as Ase V.Sidharthan’. In the Higher Secondary Examination (Class XII) Certificate, his name is shown as 'Ashwin Sidharthan'. In Ext. P6 copy of Passport as well as in the PAN Card, Driving Licence and other public documents, his name is shown as 'Ashwin Sidharthan', which is consistent with the name shown in Ext. P5 Higher Secondary Examina

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top