Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
P.G. AJITHKUMAR
Rasiya W/o Muhammed Navaz – Appellant
Versus
Muhammed Navas S/o Hameed – Respondent
ORDER :
1. Petitioners No.1 and 3 in M.C.No.18 of 2013 on the files of the Judicial Magistrate of the First Class-I, Alappuzha filed Crl.R.P.No.377 of 2022. Respondents No.1 and 3 in that M.C. filed Crl.R.P.No.869 of 2023. Parties are referred to as they were arraigned in M.C.No.18 of 2013.
2. The 1st petitioner is the wife of the 1st respondent. Their marriage was solemnised on 03.11.1996. The petitioners No.2 and 3 are their children. Respondent Nos.2 and 3 are the mother and sister respectively of respondent No.1. The petitioners filed M.C.No.18 of 2013 under Section 12 of the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005 (PWDV Act) claiming protection order and monetary reliefs including maintenance. The trial court, after considering the evidence on record, granted reliefs as follows:
“1) 1st and 3rd petitioners are restrained from committing any act of domestic violence against the petitions.
2) The 1st and 3rd counter petitioners are restrained from alienating the property comprised in Sy.No.523/26B without the leave of the court concerned.
3) The 1st counter petitioner is directed to return Rs.1,00,000/- (Rupees one lakh only) and 50 sovereigns of gold ornaments or the
The court ruled that a claim for compensation under domestic violence legislation requires meticulous evidence evaluation, and insufficient evidence leads to a miscarriage of justice that necessitate....
The judgment underscores the necessity of fair trial rights in domestic violence cases and the importance of thorough evidence evaluation when determining monetary claims under the Protection of Wome....
The Family Court's prior ruling on the non-entitlement to Rs.2 lakhs bars the 1st respondent from claiming the same amount under the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act.
The court upheld protective measures under domestic violence law due to established acts of domestic violence and affirmed lower court decisions.
Emotional violence and dowry demands constitute domestic violence, affirming the petitioner as an aggrieved person under the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005.
The court emphasized the necessity for financial disclosure in domestic violence cases to ensure fair maintenance assessments, mandating adherence to established principles from prior apex court ruli....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
