Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
SUSHRUT ARVIND DHARMADHIKARI, SYAM KUMAR V.M.
State Of Kerala – Appellant
Versus
Mukhil Ram T.S., S/o Adv.T.Thankachan – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. background of the case and educational assistance claim. (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. arguments from appellants and respondent regarding scholarship eligibility. (Para 5 , 6) |
| 3. discussion on legal guidelines for educational assistance. (Para 7 , 8 , 9) |
| 4. court's legal reasoning on scholarship guidelines. (Para 10) |
JUDGMENT :
Sushrut Arvind Dharmadhikari, J.
The present intra-Court Appeals under Section 5 of the Kerala High Court Act 1958 assails the judgment dated 17.12.2021 passed in W.P.(C) No.27106/2021 and the order dated 28.09.2022 in Review Petition No.809/2022 in W.P.(C) No. 27106/2021 whereby the learned Single Judge allowed the writ petition filed by the respondent herein, and dismissed the Review Petition filed by the State.
2. Though both the Writ Appeals arise out of the same issue, in W.A. No. 1634/2022, the appellants have challenged the judgment dated 17.12.2021 passed in W.P.(C) No. 27106/2021, whereas in W.A. No. 11/2023, the appellants have challenged the order passed in R.P. No. 809/2022 in W.P.(C) No. 27106/2021.
Facts
3. The brief facts of the case are that the respondent is a member of the Scheduled Caste Community. He had undergone Civil Pilot License Cour
Educational assistance cannot be denied to students in recognized private institutions based solely on location if training is unavailable locally.
Government is not at liberty to classify the benefits available to the members of the Scheduled Caste community, for the mere reason that they have secured admission directly in the institutions mana....
The court affirmed the management's right to challenge state restrictions on admission based on domicile, emphasizing adherence to established guidelines that permit domicile-free management quotas.
The court established that the government has the authority to formulate scholarship policies and eligibility criteria, provided they are not arbitrary or in violation of statutory provisions, and th....
The court ruled that the exclusion of management quota students from post matric scholarships does not violate fundamental rights, adhering to a lawful policy decision.
Benefits obtained through false claims of caste cannot be protected, as it undermines the rights of genuine candidates.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
