Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
Anil K.Narendran, Muralee Krishna S.
K.N.Raveendranathan – Appellant
Versus
State Of Kerala, Represented By Additional Chief Secretary, Finance (Pwca) Department – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. challenge to tribunal's dismissal of pay parity claim. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. employer response on pay scales and lack of interchangeability. (Para 3 , 4 , 5 , 6) |
| 3. restatement of supervisory powers over lower courts and tribunals. (Para 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13) |
| 4. conclusions on pay revision and the enforceability of parity. (Para 14 , 15) |
| 5. final ruling that dismisses the petition. (Para 16) |
JUDGMENT :
The petitioner who is the applicant in O.A. No.1421 of 2022 on the file of the Kerala Administrative Tribunal (the ‘Tribunal’ in short), Thiruvananthapuram, filed this original petition invoking supervisory jurisdiction of this Court under Article 227 of the Constitution of India challenging the order dated 19.08.2024 whereby the Tribunal dismissed that original application filed by the petitioner claiming parity in the scale of pay with that of Dy.S.P (Senior Grade), Deputy Commissioner Excise, Senior Joint Director (Factories and Boilers), Deputy Commissioner, Sales Tax, DIG of Prison, Senior Deputy Transport Commissioner, Additional Director, Mining and Geology, Deputy Director (Information and Public Relations), which according to him are identical posts as that of the po
The tribunal's refusal to grant pay parity was upheld, emphasizing that pay structure decisions lie within the domain of the Pay Commission, highlighting the non-enforceable nature of pay parity clai....
Tribunal cannot grant higher promotional pay scale to one cadre's employees matching another distinct cadre's juniors by one-time parity, as it exceeds jurisdiction absent Article 14 violation from r....
The main legal point established in the judgment is the requirement for establishing parity in pay scales based on comparative job evaluation and equation of posts, and the burden of proof on the pet....
Doctrine of equal pay for equal work is not an abstract doctrine and is capable of being enforced in a Court of law i.e. equal pay must be for equal work of equal value.
Direct appointees entitled to pay parity with transferred employees and departmental counterparts performing identical duties, as unequal pay scales violate Articles 14/16; courts rectify arbitrary a....
The principle of equal pay for equal work does not entitle employees to claim parity in pay scales if their recruitment processes differ significantly.
The refusal to accept a transfer does not negate entitlement to a higher pay scale after the requisite service period, especially when the posts are equivalent.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
