SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Ker) 231

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
P. V. BALAKRISHNAN, J.
Alavikutty. T. K – Petitioner 
Versus 
State Of Kerala, Represented By The Secretary To Government, Registration Department – Respondent 
WP(C) NO. 40794 OF 2024
Decided On : 11-03-2026 

Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner: Sri.T.C.Suresh Menon, Sri.B. Deepak
For the Respondent: Sri. K.M. Faisal, Gp

Exempted government officers under Section 88 of the Registration Act are not required to appear personally for document registration, irrespective of the state jurisdiction.

Headnote:(A) Registration Act, 1908 - Section 88 - Writ of mandamus - The petitioner sought to prevent the insistence on the personal appearance of the Superintending Engineer of TNEB for the registration of a mortgage release deed - The court found that the Superintending Engineer is exempted under Section 88(1) due to the relevant notification issued by the State Government, applicable irrespective of the state where registration is sought. (Paras 5, 6, 7)

(B) Personal Appearance - Exemption - The court ruled that personal appearance cannot be mandated for government officers exempted by notifications, affirming that such exemptions apply uniformly across the country and are not limited by state boundaries. (Paras 6, 7)

Facts of the case:
The petitioner, a permanent resident employed by TNEB, executed mortgage deeds for property in 2007 and 2013. After clearing his loan, the Petitioner faced restrictions from the Sub Registrar for registration, claiming the Superintending Engineer's presence was mandatory.

Findings of Court:
The court held the 2nd respondent must register the mortgage release deed as the Superintending Engineer was entitled to exemption under Section 88.

Issues: The primary issue was whether the Superintending Engineer fell under the exempted group for registration participation.

Ratio Decidendi: The court determined that exemptions under Section 88 apply uniformly, prohibiting the insistence on personal appearance of exempted officers by any state registration authority.

Result: Writ petition allowed in part, directing registration of the deed.

Table of Content
1. petitioner's background and mortgage history (Para 1 , 2)
2. dispute over superintending engineer's presence (Para 4 , 5)
3. interpretation of section 88 of registration act (Para 6 , 7)

JUDGMENT :

P. V. BALAKRISHNAN, J.

This writ petition is filed by the petitioner seeking a writ of mandamus directing the 2nd respondent not to insist upon the appearance of the Superintending Engineer of Tamilnadu Generation and Distribution Corporation Ltd., who was the employer of the petitioner, for the purpose of registration of a release mortgage/gahan deed in respect of his property.

2. The petitioner, who is a permanent resident of Nilambur Taluk in Malappuram District, was employed as a Commercial Inspector in Chennai Division of Tamil Nadu Generation and Distribution Corporation Limited (Tamil Nadu Electricity Board) (for short, ‘TNEB’). In order to construct a residential building, the petitioner mortgaged his property having an extent of 10 cents of land in Re.Sy.No.879/Pt with the TNEB, in the year 2007. Subsequently, the petitioner also availed another loan for improvement of his residence. The petitioner thus executed two mortgage deeds as document Nos.5758/2007 and 4895/2013 before the 2nd respondent, Sub Registrar, for the said purpose. Thereafter, the petitioner cleared the entire loan amount and the creditor acknowledged the same as per Ext.P2. But when the petitioner presented Ext.P2 before the 2nd respondent, along with Ext.P3, the 2nd respondent informed the petitioner, as per Ext.P3 that the executant of the document, who is the Superintending Engineer of TNEB, is required to be present before him and that the petitioner is also required to pay the stamp duty for registration of the gahan release. It is in such circumstances that the petitioner approached this Court by filing this writ petition.

3. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Pleader appearing for the respondents.

4. The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the 2nd respondent cannot insist on the presence of the Superintending Engineer of TNEB for executing the document pertaining to release of mortgage/gahan since, Ext.P3 shows that he is an exempted officer falling under Section 88 of the Registration Act, 1908. He also submitted that, due to the act of the 2nd respondent, the petitioner is put to task and is facing much difficulty in dealing with the properties.

5. The learned Government Pleader submitted that, as per Section 32 of the Registration Act, the person executing the document, or any of his representatives duly authorised, has to be compulsorily present at the time of registration and that the Superintending Engineer of TNEB cannot be considered as an officer falling under the exempted group under Section 88 (1) of the Registration Act since, the notification relied on is not issued by the State of Kerala.

6. On an anxious consideration of the rival submissions and the materials on record, I find considerable force in the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner. Section 88 (1) of the Registration Act, 1908 reads as follows:-

Section 88 . Registration of documents executed by Government officers or certain public functionaries.—(1) Notwithstanding anything contained in this Act, it shall not be necessary for,—

(a) any officer of Government, or

(b) any Administrator-General, Official Trustee or Official Assignee, or

(c) the Sheriff, Receiver or Registrar of a High Court, or

(d) the holder for the time being of such other public office as may be specified in a notification in the Official Gazette issued in that behalf by the State Government, to appear in person or by agent at any registration office in any proceeding connected with the registration of any instrument executed by him or in his favour, in his official capacity, or to sign as provided in section 58.”

7. A reading of this Section shows that it exempts certain category of persons from appearance for registration. Ap

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top