SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Ori) 969

ORISSA HIGH COURT, CUTTACK
ANANDA CHANDRA BEHERA
Ritesh Patel – Appellant
Versus
State of Odisha – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner:Mr. J.K. Majhi,Advocate.
For the Opposite Parties : Mr. G. Mohanty, SC.

Table of Content
1. power of attorney holder's rights to register deeds. (Para 1 , 2 , 3)
2. legal authority of sub-registrar regarding deed registration. (Para 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9)
3. precedents restricting sub-registrar's refusal. (Para 10)
4. final order directing registration process. (Para 11 , 12)

JUDGMENT :

1. This writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India, 1950 has been filed by the Petitioner against the Opposite Parties praying for directing the Sub- Registrar, Banki (O.P. No.3) to register the deed for sale dated 18.08.2025 (original of Annexure-1).

3. On being dissatisfied with the aforesaid refusal to receive deed for registration by the O.P. No.3, the Petitioner filed this writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India, 1950 praying for directing the O.P. No.3 to accept the deed for sale dated 18.08.2025 executed by Manjuli Nayak through her registered power of attorney holder i.e. petitioner in favour of the vendee/purchaser thereof for registration and to register the same on presentation by the petitioner, as the registered power of attorney holder of the executant Manjuli Nayak.

5. Sub-Clause 1(a) of Section 33 of The

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top