IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
VIJU ABRAHAM, J.
Ramlath.A, W/O. P.A.Sharafudheen – Appellant
Versus
The Village Officer, Punnapra Village Office, Punnapra - Respondent
W.P.(C) Nos.6520, 9726 & 9689 of 2021 and 8535, 8586 & 8596 of 2023
Decided on : 30-10-2025
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. challenge to orders restoring property (Para 2 , 3) |
| 2. details of property and records (Para 4) |
| 3. counterarguments on land classification (Para 5 , 6) |
| 4. validity of the stop memo (Para 7 , 8) |
| 5. district collector's orders and authority (Para 9 , 10 , 11) |
| 6. interference with impugned directions (Para 12) |
JUDGMENT :
VIJU ABRAHAM, J.
1. Since a common issue is involved in all these writ petitions, they were heard and disposed of by a common judgment.
W.P.(C)Nos.6520, 9726 & 9689 of 2021
2. These writ petitions are filed challenging an order issued by the Village Officer, Punnapra, wherein a direction was issued to the petitioners to restore the land to its original position, or else proceedings will be initiated against them.
W.P.(C)Nos.8535, 8586 & 8596 of 2023
3. These writ petitions are filed challenging an order dated 21.02.2023 issued by the District Collector, Alappuzha, wherein a direction was issued to the petitioners to restore the property to its original position on finding that the property has been illegally converted and further, directing the Agricultural Officer to take steps to include the property in the data bank and also directing the Tahsildar(LR), Ambalappuzha to include the property as 'nilam' in the BTR.
4. W.P.(C)No.8535 of 2023 will be treated as the leading case and the facts pleaded in the said writ petition are adverted to here:
A property having an extent of 5 Ares 99 sq.m., comprised in Sy.No.442/16 of Punnapra Village(old Sy.No.158/1A1) was purchased by the petitioner as per Ext.P1 sale deed and the said purchase was made after ascertaining the true nature of the property, since the petitioner wanted to purchase a pacca dry land for the purpose of construction of a building upon the said property. Ext.P2 fair value notification fixed the land value of the said land as Rs.2,25,000/-, treating the said property as a residential plot with national highway - PWD road access. By Ext.P3, the Agricultural Officer, Krishibhavan, Punnapra intimated that the property is not included in the data bank. In Ext.P4 Basic Tax Register(BTR) the nature of the property is entered as a dry land (purayidam). Consequently Ext.P5 tax receipt also shows the property as purayidam. Ext.P7 is the Thandaper Register in respect of the property showing the property as purayidam and Ext.P8 Possession Certificate, where the land has been classified as dry land and after purchasing the property, mutation was effected and thereafter Ext.P9 land tax receipt was issued, which also shows the property as purayidam and further, Ext.P10 Possession Certificate after the purchase also reveals that the property has been classified as dry land. A road is passing through the northern boundary of the property under the ownership and possession of the petitioner. The Panchayat road underwent development work and gradient of the road was raised consequently, making the property of the petitioner low lying land. The petitioner would submit that he has verified every documents and records and on being satisfied that the subject property is purayidam, he has purchased the same as per Ext.P1. While so Ext.P12 notice was issued by the Village Officer, Punnappra directing the petitioner to stop the leveling work of the land and to restore the nature of the land to its original position. Aggrieved by the same a writ petition was filed as W.P.(C)No.6520 of 2021, which is also posted along with this writ petition, and by Ext.P13 interim order the Court directed the District Collector to consider the objections of the petitioner against Ext.P12 stop memo and to take a decision on the same. Ext.P15 satellite images from the KSREC was also obtained. While the matter was pending before the District Collector, this Court has issued Ext.P16 interim order staying the operation of Ext.P12 stop memo. The District Collector without considering the contentions of the petitioner in a proper manner, passed Ext.P17 order concluding that, the land is a marshy
Shanawaz Mytheenkunju v. Village Officer, Keerikkad Village
James Antony Alosious v. Revenue Divisional Officer, Alappuzha
Indira P.S. and others v. Sub Collector, Fort Kochi and another
District Collector, Kollam v. Thangal Kunju
Jessy Abrabam v. Land Revenue Commissioner, Thiruvanathapuram
A property classified as purayidam cannot be subjected to restoration orders under the Kerala Conservation of Paddy Land and Wetland Act, as jurisdiction was exceeded by local authorities.
The classification of land in the Basic Tax Register is authoritative, and the Village Officer lacks jurisdiction to issue stop memos when the property is classified as 'purayidom'.
The authorized officer must comply with statutory requirements when assessing land for exclusion from conservation protocols; failure to do so invalidates decisions.
The Village Officer lacks jurisdiction to issue a stop memo under the Kerala Conservation of Paddy Land and Wetland Act.
The requirement of due process and proper authority is crucial in land classification and regulation under the Kerala Conservation Act and CRZ notifications.
The court determined that a stop memo issued under the Kerala Conservation of Paddy Land and Wetland Act is illegal if the property is not included in the official data bank.
The Village Officer lacked jurisdiction to issue a stop memo for property classified as 'purayidom', emphasizing the importance of the Basic Tax Register in determining land classification.
The District Collector must consider all relevant evidence before passing orders affecting property rights under conservation laws.
The Authorised Officer lacks jurisdiction to dictate the inclusion of land in the data bank without due process under the relevant Act and Rules.
The classification of land in the Basic Tax Register is authoritative, and a stop memo cannot be issued for 'purayidom' property under the Kerala Conservation of Paddy Land and Wetland Act, 2008.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.