SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2005 Supreme(Raj) 1428

High Court Of Rajasthan
Judgename : Manak Mohta
Sua Moto - Appellant
Versus
State of Rajasthan - Respondent
D.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 2856 of 2005
Decided On : 06/01/2005

Advocates Appeared:
Mr. N.M. Lodha, Additional Advocate General with Mr. S.K. Vyas, Additional Government Advocate.

The main legal point established in the judgment is the need for sensitivity in handling rape cases, the importance of victim protection, and the use of camera trials to uphold the dignity of the victim.

Headnote:

Rape - Criminal Justice System - Sections 375, 376, 376-A, 376-B, 376-C, 376-D, 228-A, 327(2) of IPC, Code of Criminal Procedure, Evidence Act - The judgment discusses the importance of speedy and fair trial, provisions related to rape, victim protection, and victim rights. It emphasizes the need for sensitivity in handling rape cases and the use of camera trials to uphold the dignity of the victim.

Fact of the Case:

A foreign lady tourist was raped in Jodhpur, leading the court to take suo moto cognizance. The court ordered a Public Interest Litigation, directed the State of Rajasthan to ensure speedy investigation and trial, and provided for the victim's protection and compensation.

Finding of the Court:

The court found the accused guilty and sentenced them to imprisonment for life. It appreciated the prompt action of the Rajasthan Police and the expeditious trial conducted by the Additional Sessions Judge.

Issues: The court highlighted the right of the victim to expeditious and scientific investigation, protection, confidence building, speedy trial, and payment of compensation.

Ratio Decidendi: The judgment emphasized the need for sensitivity in handling rape cases, the importance of victim protection, and the use of camera trials to uphold the dignity of the victim. It also discussed the provisions related to rape, victim rights, and the role of the Criminal Justice System in providing justice to victims.

Final Decision: The accused were convicted, and the court addressed the issues related to victim rights, protection, and compensation.

Judgment

N.N. Mathur, J.-A sordid and obnoxious incident of rape on a foreign lady tourist in the intervening night of 11th and 12th May, 2005 reported in the regional Newspapers evoked the judicial conscience to take suo moto cognizance, considering that the Constitutional Courts vested with the powers under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, can no more be a silent spectator in the matter of violent crime against women and wait for its turn for dispensation of justice as provided under the relevant provisions of law.

2. In order to combat the increasing crime against women and to ensure protection and preservation of their human rights, the Criminal Justice System needs to be addressed from the point of view of systematic Victim Support Service. There is need to promote proactive role of police as well as the trial Courts. Thus, in order to expedite the investigation, to provide protection to the victim, ensuring production of material witnesses during trial without delay, expeditious conclusion of the trial and payment of compensation to the victim, after noticing the incident, by order dated 13.05.2005, we ordered as follows:

"2. The rape is serious crime whether it is of a foreign tourist or any other woman. However, it leaves a question mark on the safety of the foreign tourist in the City of Jodhpur. It is likely to create panic amongst the tourists visiting Jodhpur and the other parts of the Country.

3. In the peculiar facts and circumstancesof the case, we consider it appropriate to take cognizance of the incident and direct as follows:

(i) The Registry is directed to register a Suo Moto petition under the label of "Public Interest Litigation".

(ii) TheState of Rajasthan through Secretary Department of Home, the Director, Tourism and Superintendent of Police (City) Jodhpur be impleaded as party respondents.

(iii) A notice be issued to the said respondents returnable within a period of one week.

4. By ad interim order, further directions are given as follows:-

(a) The Superintendent of Police, City Jodhpur is directed to ensure that the investigation of the case is concluded at the earliest.

(b) All the agencies concerned with the investigation, including Director F.S.L. are directed to co-operate with the investigation. F.S.L. Report must reach on or before 16.05.2005.

(c) In event of filing of charge-sheet, the learned Sessions Judge is directed to ensure that the trial of the case is concluded expeditiously as far as possible within a period of one month from the date of filing of charge-sheet.

(b) The Superintendent of Police, City Jodhpur is directed to ensure the safety of the victim.

(e) The State of Rajasthan is directed to bear all the expenses of the victim for her overstay on account of the incident. She will be paid lodging and boarding expenses for visiting Jodhpur for investigation or trial in connection with aforesaid incident.

(f) Thequestion with respect to the payment of compensation shall be decided after hearing Counsel for the State on the next date of hearing.

(g) ThePrincipal Secretary, Department of Home, State of Rajasthan is directed to ensure the compliance of the order.

(h) A copy of the order be sent to the Principal Secretary, Department of Home, State of Rajasthan today itself by fax.

(i) A copy of the order be also served on the victim."

Speedy & Fair Investigation And Trial:

3. Conducting a fair trial for those, who are accused of criminal offence, is the cardinal stone of democracy. Conducting the speedy and fair trial is beneficial both to the accused as well as to the Society, which includes the victim. The right to speedy trial of criminal offence has been recognized, implicit in the broad sweep and content of Article 21". In Kartar Singh vs. State of Punjab, reported in 1994 (3) SCC 569, the Apex Court has observed:

"The concept of speedy trial is read into Article 21 as an essential part of the fundamental right to life and liberty guaranteed and preserved under our Constitu









































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top