SANDEEP MEHTA, MANOJ KUMAR GARG
In Re A Ref. U/s 395 Cr. P. C. By District and Sessions Judge, Pali – Appellant
Versus
Unknown – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
SANDEEP MEHTA, J.
1. The learned Sessions Judge, Pali has forwarded a reference to this Court under Section 395 Cr.P.C. for answering the following legal questions:
(2) WHETHER the order passed by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Shahada Khatoon (supra) operates as binding precedent or it qualifies as a mere observation in light of the arguments advanced by the appellant in that case?
(3) WHETHER clarification of the Hon'ble Supreme Court's Order in the case of Shahada Khatoon (supra) by Full Bench of the Kerala High Court in the case of Santosh v. State and by the Hon'ble Bombay High Court in Gorakshnath's case (supra) are required to be read in light of the arguments advanced in the said case?”
2. The matter was registered as D.B. Criminal Reference No. 2/2020. This Court, vide order dated 06.01.2021, directed that a notice of the reference be published in the cause list so as to notify the members of
Badshah v. Urmila Badshah Godse
Commissioner of Income Tax v. Sun Engineering Works (P) Ltd.
State of Gujarat v. Utility Users' Welfare Assn.
State of Uttaranchal v. Sandeep Kumar Singh
Divisional Controller, KSRTC v. Mahadeva Shetty
P.S. Sathappan v. Andhra Bank Ltd.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.