Suresh Kumar vs State - 2022 Supreme(Raj) 333

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2022 Supreme(Raj) 333

PUSHPENDRA SINGH BHATI
Suresh Kumar – Appellant
Versus
State – Respondent

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant :M.S. Purohit, Manisha Purohit and Jagmal Singh Choudhary, Sr. Adv. assisted by Pradeep Choudhary, Advocate.
For the Respondents: Anda Ram Choudhary, P.P.

JUDGMENT/ORDER :

Pushpendra Singh Bhati, J.

1. Both the Criminal Appeals has been preferred under Section 374 Cr.P.C. against the Judgment dated 16.04.2009 passed by District and Sessions Judge (Anti Corruption Act Cases), Bikaner in Sessions Case No. 29/2005 with the following prayers:-

In S.B. Criminal Appeal No. 297/2009:

It is, therefore, respectfully prayed that this appeal may kindly be allowed and accused appellant may be acquitted from all the charges leveled against him."

In S.B. Criminal Appeal No. 299/2009:

It is, therefore, most respectfully prayed that this appeal may kindly be allowed, the judgment/order of conviction and sentence passed by the learned Session, A.C.D. Cases, Bikaner dated 16.04.2009 may kindly be quashed and set-aside and the accused-appellant may kindly be acquitted for the alleged charges leveled against him."

2. The controversy in both the appeals are common, and the facts in brief of the same, as placed before this Court by learned counsel for appellants are that one F.I.R. was lodged on 24.06.2004 by Shri Amar Singh (P.W.1), stating that he went to the Anti - Corruption Office at Hanumangarh, where he submitted an application stating therein that, abou