ANOOP KUMAR DHAND
Bal Kishan Sharma S/o Late Shri Rewatilal – Appellant
Versus
Ram Transport Finace Limited, Through Authorized Officer – Respondent
ORDER :
1. None is present on behalf of appellant even in the second round.
2. This appeal is lying in defect side since 2020 but no steps have been taken for removing the same till date. It appears that the appellant is not interested in pursuing with this appeal.
3. This appeal is also barred by 615 days. Application under Section 5 of the Limitation Act has also been filed but the Court is not satisfied with the reasons recorded in the said application. Even from bare perusal of the order dated 09.04.2018 passed by the Additional District Judge No.11, Jaipur Metropolitan in Civil Misc. Case No.1016/2015, it is clear that the objections filed by the appellant under Section 34(3) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act were not submitted within time.
4. For ready reference Section 34(3) of the Act of 1996 is reproduced as under:-
5. It is not in dispute that the a
Union of India Vs. Popular Construction Co.
State of Himachal Pradesh & Anr. vs. Himachal Techno Engineers & Anr.
P. Radha Bai Vs. P. Ashok Kumar
State of H.P. vs. Himachal Techno Engineers
Assam Urban Water Water Supply & Sewerage Board vs. Subash Projects & Mktg. Ltd.
Anil Kumar Jinabhai Patel vs. Pravinchandra Jinabhai Patel
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.