IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL
SHARAD KUMAR SHARMA, J.
Union of India - Appellant
Versus
Pritam Singh Bisht and Another - Respondents
Appeal from Order Nos.419, 420, 421, 422, 423, 424, 425, 427, 428, 429, 432, 438 of 2023
Decided On : 28-11-2023
Arbitration and Conciliation Act - Challenge to Arbitral Award - Section 34
Fact of the Case:
The appeals arose from orders dismissing proceedings under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, on the ground of belated challenge to the arbitral award.
Finding of the Court:
The court found that the challenge to the arbitral award was barred by the provisions of sub Section (3) of Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, as the limitation period for challenge was not extendable.
Issues: The main issue was whether the court could extend the time period for challenging an arbitral award under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act.
Ratio Decidendi: The court held that the period for challenging an award under Section 34 cannot be extended beyond the prescribed period provided in the Act, as the Act is a self-contained special law and the provisions of the Limitation Act do not apply.
Final Decision: The court dismissed the Appeals from Orders, finding them lacking in merit.
JUDGMENT :
Sharad Kumar Sharma, J.
These bunch of 12 Appeals from Orders, as it has been preferred under Section 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, arise out of the impugned order dated 18.07.2023, as passed in respective Miscellaneous Cases being the proceedings under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, whereby the proceedings have been dismissed on the ground that the impugned award dated 29.08.2019, as rendered in the respective Arbitration Cases, there has been a belated challenge given to the same, which under law could not be belatedly challenged in accordance with the provisions contained under sub Section (3) of Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. Consequently, the respective impugned orders have been passed on 18.07.2023, the details of which are given hereunder by way of schedule.
| Sl. No. | AO No. | Arbitration Case No. | Date of award | Miscellaneous Case No. | Date of impugned award |
| 1. | 419/2023 | 121 of 2018 | 29.08.2019 | 15 of 2021 | 18.07.2023 |
| 2. | 420/2023 | 142 of 2018 | 29.08.2019 | 26 of 2021 | 18.07.2023 |
| 3. | 421/2023 | 43 of 2018 | 29.08.2019 | 118 of 2021 | 18.07.2023 |
| 4. | 422/2023 | 136 of 2018 | 29.08.2019 | 117 of 2021 | 18.07.2023 |
| 5. | 423/2023 | 42 of 2018 | 29.08.2019 | 20 of 2021 | 18.07.2023 |
| 6. | 424/2023 | 141 of 2018 | 29.08.2019 | 36 of 2021 | 18.07.2023 |
| 7. | 425/2023 | 120 of 2018 | 29.08.2019 | 22 of 2021 | 18.07.2023 |
| 8. | 427/2023 | 139 of 2018 | 29.08.2019 | 32 of 2021 | 18.07.2023 |
| 9. | 428/2023 | 28 of 2018 | 29.08.2019 | 39 of 2023 | 18.07.2023 |
| 10. | 429/2023 | 38 of 2018 | 29.08.2019 | 31 of 2021 | 18.07.2023 |
| 11. | 432/2023 | 41 of 2018 | 29.08.2019 | 18 of 2021 | 18.07.2023 |
| 12. | 438/2023 | 134 of 2018 | 29.08.2019 | 119 of 2021 | 18.07.2023 |
2. To deal with factually, the aforementioned Appeals from Orders emanate from the respective Arbitration Cases as referred to hereinabove, wherein the challenge was given by the appellant to the order which has been passed in the respective Miscellaneous Cases (referred above), which was emanating from an award dated 29.08.2019. The Court of District Judge, Uttarkashi, by the impugned judgment under challenge i.e. 18.07.2023 has dismissed the Miscellaneous Cases on the ground that the proceedings were barred by the provisions contained under sub Section (3) of Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act cannot be entertained as the limitation period for its challenge was not extendable, as the Limitation Act will not apply over the proceedings under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act.
3. Briefly stated facts are that in pursuance to certain contractual obligations between the parties and owing to a dispute having arisen between the parties, the matter was referred to the Arbitrator for adjudicating upon the dispute as referred to it as per the terms of the contract, for resolving the dispute through Arbitrator and consequently, an award was rendered on 29.08.2019, which happens to be almost similar in all the cases which are listed today, emanating from the respective Miscellaneous Cases referred to hereinabove in the tabulation.
4. Consequent to the aforesaid award, the proceedings under Section 34 was drawn by the appellant before the learned District Judge, Uttarkashi, by way of the aforesaid cases and the same has been dismissed by the impugned judgment under challenge on the ground that since the award has been put to challenge at a belated stage and the period of limitation, as prescribed therein under sub Section (3) of Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act of 1996, is not extendable because the provisions of Limitation Act is not applicable, the proceedings under Section 34 were accordingly dismissed, hence, the instant Appeal from Order, under Section 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act
Consolidated Engineering Enterprises Vs. Principal Secretary, Irrigation Department and others
Mahindra & Mahindra Financial Services Ltd. Vs. Maheshbhai Tinabhai Rathod
Union of India Vs. Popular Construction Company
Chintels (India) Ltd. Vs. Bhayana Builders (P) Ltd.
State of H.P. v. Himachal Techno Engineers
P. Radha Bai v. P. Ashok Kumar
Assam Urban Water Supply & Sewerage Board v. Subash Projects & Mktg. Ltd.
The period for challenging an arbitral award under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act cannot be extended beyond the prescribed period, as the Act is a self-contained special law and t....
The limitation period for challenging an arbitral award under Section 34(3) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 is strict and non-extendable, emphasizing the need for timely recourse to mai....
Point of Law : Even if the period of delay is considered to be of 21 days. Since Section 34(3) of the Act, 1996 bars condonation of delay beyond the period of 30 days after the period of 3 months is ....
Delay beyond 120 days (90+30) in Section 34 petitions or corresponding appeals under Section 37 of Arbitration Act not condonable via Limitation Act Section 5; negligence, inaction, lack of bonafides....
The limitation period for an application under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act cannot be extended beyond specified timelines, maintaining strict adherence to legal provisions.
The main legal point established in the judgment is that the limitation period for challenging an award under Section 34(3) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act is strict and cannot be extended be....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.