ANOOP KUMAR DHAND
State Of Rajasthan – Appellant
Versus
Godhara Construction Company – Respondent
JUDGMENT
Anoop Kumar Dhand, J. - Instant miscellaneous appeal has been preferred by the State of Rajasthan against the impugned judgment dated 30.08.2008 passed by the Court of Additional District and Sessions Judge (Fast Track) No. 7, Jaipur City, Jaipur in Civil Misc. Case No. 41/2008 (383/2007) (hereinafter referred to as 'the court below'), whereby objections filed by the appellant-State of Rajasthan under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (for short 'the Act of 1996') against the arbitral award dated 29.07.2000 has been rejected.
2. Brief facts leading to this appeal is that a work contract was given to the respondents for renewal work of pever and Hot Mix plant in 14 Km. Length in between Kms. 100 to 149 (in Kms. 101/0 to 104/0, 132/0 to 136/0, 141/0 to 146/0 to 149/0) on Agra Road, NH-11 for which Agreement No. 26, year 1993-94 was executed between the parties. There was an arbitration clause in this Agreement to resolve the dispute. During the progress of the work, dispute arose between the parties. Then the respondents submitted application before the District Judge under Sections 10 and 11 of the Act of 1996, who appointed an arbitrator vide order dat
Anil Kumar Jinabhai Patel vs. Pravinchandra Jinabhai Patel (2018) 15 SCC 178)
Assam Urban Water Water Supply & Sewerage Board vs. Subash Projects & Mktg. Ltd. (2012) 2 SCC 624
Chintels India Limited vs. Bhayana Builders Private Limited (2021) 4 SCC 602
P. Radha Bai vs. P. Ashok Kumar (2019) 13 SCC 445
Simplex Infrastructure Limited vs. Union of India
State of H.P. vs. Himachal Techno Engineers (2010) 12 SCC 210
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.