IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR
PANKAJ MITHAL, REKHA BORANA, JJ.
Badri Lal Soni Charitable Trust Through Its Authorised Representative Dilip Kumar Jain - Appellant
Versus
State Of Rajasthan - Respondent
D.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 10969 of 2017
Decided on : 01-12-2022
Stamp Duty - Private University - Rajasthan Public Trust Act, 1959 - Section 3(2) of the Act - Notification reducing stamp duty - Vesting of land in the university - Resolution for vesting - Instrument of conveyance - Operation of law
Fact of the Case:
The petitioner, a charitable trust, sought to establish a private university in accordance with the guidelines issued by the Government of Rajasthan. The State of Rajasthan passed the Sangam University Bhilwara Act, 2012, which provided for the vesting of the petitioner's land in the university. The petitioner challenged a direction to execute documents for vesting and a notification reducing stamp duty on the transfer of immovable property.
Finding of the Court:
The court found that the resolution passed by the petitioner for vesting the land in the university was sufficient, and the direction to execute additional documents was vague and unjustified. The notification reducing stamp duty was found to be inapplicable to transfers by operation of law.
Issues: The issues involved the requirement for executing documents for vesting, the applicability of stamp duty on transfers by operation of law, and the validity of the notification reducing stamp duty.
Ratio Decidendi: The court held that the resolution for vesting the land in the university was sufficient, and the direction to execute additional documents was unjustified. It also found that the notification reducing stamp duty did not apply to transfers by operation of law.
Final Decision: The court quashed the direction to execute documents for vesting and found no relief for the petitioner, as no proceedings had been initiated for levying stamp duty on the transfer of the land.
JUDGMENT :
Heard learned counsel for the parties.
2. The petitioner is a charitable trust allegedly registered under the Rajasthan Public Trust Act, 1959 and is possessed of 63.01 Bighas of land.
3. The petitioner floated an idea of promoting a private university, therefore it, in accordance with the Guidelines for the Establishment of a Private University by Separate Act dated 26.07.2007 issued by the Education (Gr-4) Department, Government of Rajasthan moved to the State Government for the establishment of a private university. The aforesaid guidelines provide for a minimum of 30 acres of contiguous land with construction of minimum 10,000 sq mts. of covered space for administrative and other purposes. It also provides that the proposal should contain details of plans for campus development and other infrastructure facilities.
4. On the proposal so submitted by the petitioner as a sponsoring body, the State of Rajasthan passed a legislation known as the Sangam University Bhilwara Act, 2012 (for short ‘the Act’) which received the assent of the Governor on 30th April 2012 for establishment and incorporation of a private University with the name “Sangam University”, Bhilwara in the State of Rajasthan.
5. The said Act clearly mentions that the petitioner is a registered trust and has setup educational facilities as specified in Schedule-I of Act and has also deposited an amount of Rs. 2 crores for the endowment fund.
6. The Act vide Section 3(2) lays down that the movable and immovable property specified in Schedule-I of the Act shall vest in the university and the sponsoring body shall immediately after the commencement of the Act, take steps for such vesting. The properties mentioned in Schedule-I to the said Act are none else than those owned and possessed by the petitioner i.e., the land having an area of 63.01 Bighas (39.4 acres) and the building for academic and other purposes.
7. In view of Sub-section (2) of Section 3, the properties mentioned in Schedule 1 that is, the above 63.01 Bighas of land vested in the university so established and the sponsoring body that is, the petitioner was required to take steps for such vesting. The petitioner accordingly in its meeting of the Board of Trustees held on 16.07.2012 passed a resolution to vest the aforesaid land and building of the trust in the university, so as to complete the process of vesting. Thus, by virtue of Section 3(2) of the Act coupled with the aforesaid resolution, the aforesaid land came to be vested in the university by operation of law without there being any instrument of conveyance.
8. It may be pertinent to mention here that the Rajasthan Stamp Act, 1998 (hereinafter referred to as ‘the Stamp Act’) vide Section 3 provides for the instruments chargeable to stamp duty with the corresponding rate of duty as mentioned in the schedule. Article 21 of the schedule of the Stamp Act inter alia provides for the stamp duty on instrument of conveyance at the rate of 11% of the market value of the property. The duty so chargeable on any instrument is realizable from the persons mentioned in Section 32 of the Stamp Act which specifically provides that in case of any instrument chargeable to stamp duty under the Act other than those prescribed above, the stamp duty shall be payable by the person executing the instrument.
9. The State of Rajasthan in exercise of its power under Section 9 of the Stamp Act, which provides for the exemption, reduction and modification of the stamp duty on instruments, came out with a notification dated 09th March 2015, for reduction of stamp duty by 1% on the instruments of transfer of immovable property from one sponsoring body to a private university in pursuance of the provisions of the Act of the Private University and The Guidelines for the Establishment of the Private Universities by Separate Act.
10. On the strength of aforesaid notification, the Joint Secretary, Higher Education, Government of Rajasthan vide letter dated 15.03.2017 directed th
Bharat Petroleum Corporation Limited Vs. P. Kesavan and Another
Hindustan Lever and another Vs. State of Maharashtra and Another
The main legal point established is that the resolution for vesting the land in the university was sufficient, and the notification reducing stamp duty did not apply to transfers by operation of law.
The transfer of trusteeship is deemed a 'settlement' under Article 58(ii) of the Indian Stamp Act, affirming that no conveyance occurred, but rather a handing over of management for charitable purpos....
The main legal point established in the judgment is that the State Government's authority to resume and hand over the land was justified, considering the University's agreement for exchange of land a....
Point of Law : Once this Court took cognizance in matter and directed Standing Counsel to seek instructions in matter no question arises for relegating matter under Section 210 of Code on ground of a....
The court upheld the constitutionality of the Chhattisgarh Chandulal Chandrakar Memorial Medical College, Durg (Acquisition) Act, 2021, affirming legislative competence and the separation of powers w....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.