FARJAND ALI
Vikash S/o Shri Rakma – Appellant
Versus
State Of Rajasthan – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
1. The legality, correctness and propriety of the order dated 07.09.2022 passed by the Special Judge, POCSO Act Cases, Pratapgarh in Bail Application No.113/2022, which arose out of FIR No.76/2002, Police Station Pipalkhunt has been challenged by the accused-petitioner by way of filing the instant Criminal Revision Petition.
2. The notice issued by this Court has been duly served upon the private respondents; the proof of which has been filed on record by learned Public Prosecutor as per which, the SHO, P.S. Pipalkhunt intimated the complainant regarding hearing of the instant revision petition.
3. Bereft of elaborate details, the brief facts necessary for disposal of the instant Criminal Revision Petition are that the petitioner was arrested on 05.06.2022 in connection with aforementioned FIR for the offences under Sections 363, 366, 376 (1) of the IPC and Sections 3 and 4 of the POCSO Act.
4. As per the statutory provisions contained in Sub-Clause (2) of Section 167 of the Cr.P.C., the charge-sheet is supposed to be submitted within 90 days of arrest of the accused/his or her production before the learned Magistrate concerned for remand. It is an admitted position that til
Aslam Babalal Desai v. State of Maharashtra
Bikramjit Singh Vs. State of Punjab
Hussainara Khatoon case [Hussainara Khatoon v. Home Secy., State of Bihar
Hitendra Vishnu Thakur v. State of Maharashtra (1994) 4 SCC 602
Rajnikant Jivanlal Patel v. Intelligence Officer, Narcotic Control Bureau, New Delhi
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.