ASHOK KUMAR GAUR
Mohanlal – Appellant
Versus
Learned Newly Established Rent Tribunal, Jaipur – Respondent
JUDGMENT
Ashok Kumar Gaur, J. - The present writ petition has been filed by the petitioner-tenant challenging the order/note dated 31.07.2012 passed by the Rent Tribunal, Jaipur Metropolitan, Jaipur (hereinafter shall be referred to as "the Rent Tribunal") whereby the document (Exhibit A-15) filed by the petitioner-tenant has been found inadmissible in evidence and the said document has been struck off.
2. The brief facts of the case are that the respondent-landlord filed an application for eviction of the petitioner-tenant under Section 15 of the Rajasthan Rent Control Act, 2001 (hereinafter shall be referred to as "the Act of 2001"). The respondent-landlord along with the eviction application, mentioned 10 documents in the list of documents, on which she relied and the same were marked by her as Exhibit-1 to Exhibit-10.
3. The petitioner-tenant filed reply to the said eviction application and along with his reply, he filed 15 documents and marked them as Exhibit A-1 to Exhibit A-15.
4. The petitioner-tenant has pleaded that while his evidence was recorded by the Rent Tribunal, in his cross examination, reference of a document marked as Exhibit A-15 was made and at that point of time,
Bhagat Ram v. Khetu Ram (AIR 1929 PC 110)
Bipin Shantilal Panchal v. State of Gujarat & Anr. reported in (2001) 3 SCC 1
P.C. Purushothama Reddiar v. S. Perumal [(1972) 1 SCC 9]
Privy Council in Padman V. Hanwanta (AIR 1915 PC 111)
Roman Catholic Mission V. State of Madras & Anr. (AIR 1966 SC 1457)
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.