SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Article Pause Article
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(Raj) 1419

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR
Sandeep Mehta, Kuldeep Mathur, JJ.
Jitendra Singh Rathore – Appellant
Versus
District Collector, Nagaur & Ors. – Respondents
D.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 11386/2022
Decided On : 16-08-2022

Advocates appeared:
Rituraj Singh, Advocate., for the Appellant

Establishing a permanent mechanism for addressing encroachments and directing the concerned authorities to conduct inquiries and take appropriate steps for removal of encroachments.

Headnote:

Encroachment - River - The court directed the petitioner to submit a representation to the District Collector, who shall assign the matter to the Public Land Protection Cell (PLPC) constituted under the directions of the court. The PLPC shall conduct a thorough inquiry into the representation and decide the same within three months.

Fact of the Case:

The petitioner filed a writ petition seeking directions to demarcate encroachments in the river, stop illegal activities, and remove encroachments within the river passage.

Finding of the Court:

The court found that the petitioner has a suitable remedy for ventilating grievances through the Division Bench Judgment, directing the petitioner to submit a representation to the District Collector and the PLPC for inquiry and decision.

Issues:

Ratio Decidendi: The court relied on the Division Bench Judgment to establish a permanent mechanism for addressing encroachments, directing the Chief Secretary to devise a mechanism operational in every district, and the PLPC to conduct inquiries and take appropriate steps for removal of encroachments.

Final Decision: The writ petition was disposed of with the direction for the petitioner to submit a representation to the District Collector and the PLPC for inquiry and decision.

JUDGMENT

1. The petitioner has approached this Court by way of this writ petition (PIL) with the following prayers:-

"1. By an appropriate writ order or direction respondents may kindly be directed to demarcate/ascertain through proper survey encroachments in the river.

2. By an appropriate writ order or direction respondents may kindly be directed to stop illegal sand mining and agricultural activities in the river bed.

3. By an appropriate writ order or direction respondents may kindly be directed to remove the encroachment within the passage of the river flowing through the Village Palada."

2. Having heard and considered the submissions advanced by counsel representing the petitioner and, having gone through the material available on record, we are of the firm view that the petitioner has available to him a suitable remedy for ventilating his grievances by virtue of the Division Bench Judgment of this Court in the case of Jagdish Prasad Meena & Ors. v. State of Rajasthan & Ors. passed in D.B. Civil Writ Petition (PIL) No. 10819/2018 decided on 30.01.2019 wherein this Court directed as below:-

"This Court is inundated with large number of writ petitions, styled as public interest litigation, from almost all the Districts of the State, with allegations of encroachment over the pasture land/land of 'johad', 'talab'/river/river bed/public way/Shamshan/Kabristan etc. In all such petitions, common allegation is that despite repeated complaints/representations to the concerned revenue officers, no steps are taken by them to remove the encroachment. This results in number of writ petitions being filed by the complainants/representationists before this Court. This Court has been passing orders in such matters requiring the respective District Collectors to examine the factual content of the allegations and take steps to remove the encroachments so as to secure such land.

In order therefore to provide a pan-Rajasthan solution to this ever persisting problem, we deem it appropriate to direct the Chief Secretary of the State to devise a permanent mechanism, which should be operational in every District of the State where the concerned District Collector should be required to periodically notify for the information of the general public to lodge the complaints/representations with regard to such encroachments with a specially designated Public Land Protection Cell (for short 'PLPC') for rural areas. The PLPC should be headed by District Collector and function under his direction and supervision. The PLPC shall get such complaints/representations enquired into by deputing concerned Sub Divisional Officer/Tehsildar/Naib Tehsildar so as to verify whether or not such encroachments have actually taken place on such land. If the allegations are found to be substantiated, appropriate steps in accordance with law be immediately taken for removal of the encroachments and appropriate penal action be also taken against the trespassers. The complaints/representations received in the PLPC should be decided by passing speaking order, informing the respective complainant/representationist about the action taken. This would obviate the necessity of such complainants/representationists approaching this Court directly by way of public interest litigation. If this practice is put in place, this Court would not be inclined to directly entertain such public interest litigation or would do so only in the event of inaction on the part of the concerned PLPC. The PLPC aforementioned shall also keep in view the guidelines issued by the Supreme Court in Jagpal Singh & Others v. State of Punjab & Others, (2011) 11 SCC 396 wherein all the State Governments of the country were directed that they should prepare schemes for eviction of illegal/unauthorised occupants of the Gram Sabha/Gram Panchayat/Poramboke/Shamlat land and the same must be restored to the Gram Sabha/Gram Panchayat for the common use of villagers of the village. The said scheme should provide for the speedy

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top