SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(Raj) 1635

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR
Pushpendra Singh Bhati, J.
Chittari Agricare Pvt. Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
State Of Rajasthan – Respondent
S.B. Criminal Misc. (Pet.) Nos. 5608 and 5606/2021
Decided On : 12-07-2022

Advocates appeared:
Rakesh Verma, Advocate, for the Appellant
Aniruddh Purohit, AGA, for the Respondents

The main legal point established in the judgment is the importance of detailed documentation of the procedure followed in drawing samples of fertilizers to ensure compliance with the law and maintain fairness in the proceedings.

Headnote:

Essential Commodities Act - Fertilizer Control Order - 1955, 1985 - Section 3, 7 - The court discussed the provisions of Clause 19 of the Fertilizer Control Order, 1985, and its invocation under Section 3 of the Essential Commodities Act, 1955. The court highlighted the mandatory procedure for drawing samples of fertilizers as stipulated in the Fertilizer Control Order, 1985, and emphasized the importance of reflecting the mode of performing such acts in the corresponding documents to maintain fairness and compliance with the law. The court relied on the judgment in Ms. Chittari Agricare Pvt. Ltd. v. State of Rajasthan to establish the necessity of detailed documentation of the procedure followed in drawing samples to instill confidence and sanctity in the proceedings.

Fact of the Case:

The case arose from a complaint made on 18.10.2000, where a Fertilizer Inspector drew a sample of fertilizer from the depot of the company. The petitioner sought to quash the impugned Complaint No. 283/03 dated 24.09.2003 u/s. 3 & 7 of Essential Commodities Act, 1955 read with the provisions of Clause 19 of the Fertilizer Control Order, 1985.

Finding of the Court:

The court found that the controversy was covered by the judgment of M/s. Chittari Agricare (supra) and allowed the petition, quashing the proceedings.

Issues: The issues revolved around the compliance with the mandatory procedure for drawing samples of fertilizers as stipulated in the Fertilizer Control Order, 1985, and the invocation of the Essential Commodities Act, 1955.

Ratio Decidendi: The court emphasized the necessity of reflecting the mode of performing acts in the corresponding documents to maintain fairness and compliance with the law, as highlighted in the judgment of M/s. Chittari Agricare (supra).

Final Decision: The present petition was allowed, and the proceedings were quashed.

JUDGMENT

Pushpendra Singh Bhati, J. - Learned counsel for the petitioner has preferred this petition with the following prayer:-

      "In the wake of above submissions, it is respectfully prayed that this petition may kindly be allowed and the present impugned Complaint No. 283/03 dated 24.09.2003 u/s. 3 & 7 of Essential Commodities Act, 1955 read with the provisions of Clause 19 of the Fertilizer Control Order, 1985 titled as "State v. M/s. Chittari Agricare Pvt. Ltd. and Others" as pending adjudication in the Court of Ld. CJM, Sri Ganganagar at Annexure P-1, Summoning Order dated 24.09.2003 at Annexure P-2, Order dated 06.02.2017, as passed by Ld. CJM, Sri Ganganagar at Annexure P-3 and all consequential proceedings arising there from qua the Petitioner-Company may kindly be quashed by this Hon'ble Court.

      It is further prayed that further proceedings pending in the present Complaint case in the Court of Ld. CJM, Sri Ganganagar may kindly be stayed till the final decision of the present petition by this Hon'ble Court."

      Prayer made in S.B. Crl. Misc. Petition No. 5606/2021 is as under:-

      "In the wake of above submissions, it is respectfully prayed that this petition may kindly be allowed and the present impugned Complaint No. 282/03 dated 24.09.2003 u/s. 3 & 7 of Essential Commodities Act, 1955 read with the provisions of Clause 19 of the Fertilizer Control Order, 1985 titled as "State v. M/s. Verma Agro Agency & Ors." as pending adjudication in the Court of Ld. CJM, Sri Ganganagar at Annexure P-1, Summoning Order dated 24.09.2003 at Annexure P-2, Order dated 06.02.2017, as passed by Ld. CJM, Sri Ganganagar at Annexure P-3 and all consequential proceedings arising there from qua the Petitioner-Company may kindly be quashed by this Hon'ble Court.

      It is further prayed that further proceedings pending in the present Complaint case in the Court of Ld. CJM, Sri Ganganagar may kindly be stayed till the final decision of the present petition by this Hon'ble Court."

      2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the present case arises out of a complaint made on 18.10.2000, whereby one Fertilizer Inspector drew a sample of one fertilizer namely Zinc EDTA Nutriment Brand from the depot of the company situated at Sri Ganganagar.

      3. The precise submission of the counsel for the petitioner is that Fertilizer Control Order 19 85 is invoked as issued under Section 3 of the Essential Commodities Act, 1955 and such order stipulated mandatory procedure to be followed by Fertilizer Inspector.

      4. Learned counsel for the petitioner has drawn attention of this Court to the Schedule (II) of para A of Fertilizer Control Order, 1985, the relevant provisions of which are as follows:-

          Part-A

          PROCEDURE FOR DRAWAL OF SAMPLES OF FERTILIZERS

          1. General requirement of sampling:

          In drawing samples, the following measures and precautions should be observed.

          (a) Samples shall not be taken at a place exposed to rain/sun;

          (b) The sampling instruments shall be clean and dry when used;

          (c) The material being sampled, the sampling instrument and the bags of samples should be free from any adventitious contaminations;

          (d) To draw a representative sample, the contents of each bag selected for sampling should be mixed as thoroughly as possible by suitable means;

          (e) The sample should be kept in suitable, clean dry and air tight glass or screwed hard polythene bottle of about 400 gm capacity or in a thick gauged polythene bag. This should be put in a cloth bag which may be sealed with the Inspector's seal after putting inside the detailed description as specified in Form "J" Identifiable details may also be put on the cloth bag like sample No./Code No. or any other details which enables its identification;

          (f) Each sample bag should be sealed air tight after filling and marked with details of sample, type and brand of fertilizer, name of dealer/manufacturer/importer and the name of Inspector who has collected sample.

          2. Sampling from bagged material:

          (i) Scale of sampling

          (a) Lot (for manufac

                  Click Here to Read the rest of this document
                  1
                  2
                  3
                  4
                  5
                  6
                  7
                  8
                  9
                  10
                  11
                  SupremeToday Portrait Ad
                  supreme today icon
                  logo-black

                  An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

                  Please visit our Training & Support
                  Center or Contact Us for assistance

                  qr

                  Scan Me!

                  India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

                  For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

                  whatsapp-icon Back to top